The School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;107(12):3316-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.00901.2011. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
Previous research has shown that reach endpoints vary with the starting position of the reaching hand and the location of the reach target in space. We examined the effect of movement direction of a proprioceptive target-hand, immediately preceding a reach, on reach endpoints to that target. Participants reached to visual, proprioceptive (left target-hand), or visual-proprioceptive targets (left target-hand illuminated for 1 s prior to reach onset) with their right hand. Six sites served as starting and final target locations (35 target movement directions in total). Reach endpoints do not vary with the movement direction of the proprioceptive target, but instead appear to be anchored to some other reference (e.g., body). We also compared reach endpoints across the single and dual modality conditions. Overall, the pattern of reaches for visual-proprioceptive targets resembled those for proprioceptive targets, while reach precision resembled those for the visual targets. We did not, however, find evidence for integration of vision and proprioception based on a maximum-likelihood estimator in these tasks.
先前的研究表明,伸手的终点会随着伸手手的起始位置和目标在空间中的位置而变化。我们研究了在伸手之前,一个本体感受目标手的运动方向对伸向那个目标的伸手终点的影响。参与者用右手伸向视觉、本体感受(左手目标)或视觉-本体感受目标(目标手在伸手开始前照亮 1 秒)。六个位置作为起始和最终目标位置(总共 35 个目标运动方向)。伸手终点并不随本体感受目标的运动方向而变化,而是似乎固定在其他一些参考物上(例如身体)。我们还比较了单模态和双模态条件下的伸手终点。总体而言,视觉-本体感受目标的伸手模式与本体感受目标相似,而伸手精度则与视觉目标相似。然而,我们在这些任务中并没有基于最大似然估计器找到视觉和本体感受整合的证据。