Suppr超能文献

高分辨率 3D-稳态干扰磁共振成像和 3D 时间飞跃磁共振血管造影在神经血管压迫中的应用:3T 与 1.5T 的比较。

High-resolution 3D-constructive interference in steady-state MR imaging and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in neurovascular compression: a comparison between 3T and 1.5T.

机构信息

Department of Neuroradiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Aug;33(7):1251-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2974. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High-resolution MR imaging is useful for diagnosis and preoperative planning in patients with NVC. Because high-field MR imaging promises higher SNR and resolution, the aim of this study was to determine the value of high-resolution 3D-CISS and 3D-TOF MRA at 3T compared with 1.5T in patients with NVC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients with NVC, trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia were examined at 1.5T and 3T, including high-resolution 3D-CISS and 3D-TOF MRA sequences. Delineation of anatomic structures, overall image quality, severity of artifacts, visibility of NVC, and assessment of the SNR and CNR were compared between field strengths.

RESULTS

SNR and CNR were significantly higher at 3T (P < .001). Significantly better anatomic conspicuity, including delineation of CNs, nerve branches, and assessment of small vessels, was obtained at 3T (P < .02). Severity of artifacts was significantly lower at 3T (P < .001). Consequently, overall image quality was significantly higher at 3T. NVC was significantly better delineated at 3T (P < .001). Six patients in whom NVC was not with certainty identifiable at 1.5T were correctly diagnosed at 3T.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NVC may benefit from the higher resolution and greater sensitivity of 3T for preoperative assessment of NVC, and 3T may be of particular value when 1.5T is equivocal.

摘要

背景与目的

高分辨率磁共振成像对于诊断和术前计划在颅神经血管压迫(NVC)患者中非常有用。由于高场强磁共振成像有望提供更高的信噪比和分辨率,本研究旨在比较 3T 与 1.5T 高分辨率 3D-CISS 和 3D-TOF MRA 在 NVC 患者中的应用价值。

材料与方法

47 例 NVC、三叉神经痛、面肌痉挛和舌咽神经痛患者分别在 1.5T 和 3T 下进行检查,包括高分辨率 3D-CISS 和 3D-TOF MRA 序列。比较两种场强下解剖结构的勾画、整体图像质量、伪影严重程度、NVC 的显示程度,以及信噪比和对比噪声比。

结果

3T 时 SNR 和 CNR 显著升高(P<0.001)。3T 时解剖结构的显示明显更好,包括颅神经、神经分支和小血管的勾画(P<0.02)。3T 时伪影严重程度显著降低(P<0.001)。因此,3T 时整体图像质量显著提高。3T 时 NVC 的显示明显更好(P<0.001)。在 1.5T 不能明确识别的 6 例 NVC 患者,在 3T 时得到了正确诊断。

结论

NVC 患者可能受益于 3T 更高的分辨率和更高的敏感性,用于术前评估 NVC,当 1.5T 存在疑问时,3T 可能具有特殊价值。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Clinical advantages of 3.0 T MRI over 1.5 T.3.0T磁共振成像相对于1.5T的临床优势。
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Jan;65(1):2-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.006. Epub 2007 Dec 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验