• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家能力:儿童福利私有化中缺失的一环。

State capacity: the missing piece in child welfare privatization.

作者信息

Barillas Katherine Howard

机构信息

One Voice Texas, USA.

出版信息

Child Welfare. 2011;90(3):111-27.

PMID:22403903
Abstract

Privatization has been used to address the limited capacity of government to achieve positive results in child welfare systems. Privatized systems have not realized better outcomes than their public counterparts, however, and many states continue to struggle with implementation. In order to demonstrate that privatization is in fact an investment on the part of the state, rather than a solution to limited public resources, this article explores the relationship between state capacity and privatization and makes recommendations for more effective partnerships between the public and private sectors.

摘要

私有化已被用于解决政府在儿童福利系统中取得积极成果的能力有限的问题。然而,私有化系统并未取得比公共系统更好的成果,许多州仍在努力推进实施。为了证明私有化实际上是国家的一种投资,而不是解决公共资源有限的办法,本文探讨了国家能力与私有化之间的关系,并就公共部门和私营部门之间建立更有效的伙伴关系提出了建议。

相似文献

1
State capacity: the missing piece in child welfare privatization.国家能力:儿童福利私有化中缺失的一环。
Child Welfare. 2011;90(3):111-27.
2
Facing the challenge of a changing system: training child welfare workers in a privatized environment.面对不断变化的系统的挑战:在私有化环境中培训儿童福利工作者。
J Health Soc Policy. 2002;15(3-4):177-87. doi: 10.1300/J045v15n03_12.
3
Protecting the future of indigenous children and nations: an examination of the Indian Child Welfare Act.保护原住民儿童和民族的未来:对《印第安儿童福利法》的审视
J Health Soc Policy. 1999;10(4):35-50. doi: 10.1300/J045v10n04_03.
4
Private vs public child welfare systems: A comparative analysis of national safety outcome performance.私人与公共儿童福利系统:国家安全结果表现的比较分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Aug;94:104024. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104024. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
The state action doctrine and the Local Government Antitrust Act: the restructured public hospital model.国家行为原则与《地方政府反垄断法》:重组后的公立医院模式。
Am J Law Med. 1988;14(2-3):171-219.
6
Accountability in social service contracting: the state action doctrine and beyond.社会服务合同中的问责制:国家行为原则及其他。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2004 Winter;27(3):304-30.
7
Community care, competition and coercion: a legal perspective on privatized mental health care.社区护理、竞争与强制:关于私营化精神卫生保健的法律视角
Am J Law Med. 1993;19(1-2):145-75.
8
Understanding and measuring child welfare outcomes.理解和衡量儿童福利成果。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2008;5(1-2):135-56. doi: 10.1300/J394v05n01_06.
9
Privatized managed care and forensic mental health services.民营化管理式医疗与法医精神卫生服务。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1998;26(1):123-9.
10
Child fatality review teams: a content analysis of social policy.
Child Welfare. 2011;90(3):91-110.