Suppr超能文献

测量儿童的程序性模仿能力:学前模仿和动作技能量表(PIPS)的进一步验证。

Measuring procedural imitation aptitude in children: further validation of the Preschool Imitation and Praxis Scale (PIPS).

机构信息

Department of Health Care, PHL University College.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Dec;113(3):773-92. doi: 10.2466/10.11.22.PMS.113.6.773-792.

Abstract

The Preschool Imitation and Praxis Scale (PIPS) was developed to measure bodily and procedural imitation aptitude in young children. However, the investigation of procedural imitation is more complex than that of bodily imitation. The procedural imitation tasks of the PIPS mainly consisted of unusual acts upon objects (for example, switching on a lamp in a toy animal with the forehead). This study assessed the suitability of these tasks by ruling out nonimitative learning in 15 typically developing children between 12 and 55 mo. of age (6 girls, 9 boys). Results indicated that the tasks seem novel and unlikely to be performed spontaneously by the children. In addition, the number of target acts performed by the children in the imitation condition was significantly higher than in the baseline, investigator-manipulation, and imitation-enhancement nonimitative control conditions. Finally, the tasks elicited more frequently imitative behaviour than end-state emulation. Therefore, the tasks appear appropriate to measure procedural imitation, and the findings support the theoretical validity of the PIPS.

摘要

《学前模仿与实践量表》(PIPS)旨在测量幼儿的身体模仿和程序模仿能力。然而,程序模仿的研究比身体模仿更为复杂。PIPS 的程序模仿任务主要包括对物体的非常规动作(例如,用额头打开玩具动物中的灯)。本研究通过排除 15 名年龄在 12 至 55 个月的正常发育儿童(6 名女孩,9 名男孩)中的非模仿性学习,评估了这些任务的适用性。结果表明,这些任务看起来很新颖,儿童不太可能自发完成。此外,在模仿条件下,儿童执行的目标动作数量明显高于基线、调查员操作和模仿增强非模仿性控制条件。最后,这些任务引发的模仿行为比终端状态模拟更频繁。因此,这些任务似乎适合测量程序模仿,并且研究结果支持 PIPS 的理论有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验