• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晶体液与羟乙基淀粉试验(CHEST)的统计分析计划。

Statistical analysis plan for the Crystalloid Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial (CHEST).

机构信息

George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2012 Mar;14(1):44-52.

PMID:22404061
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Crystalloid Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial (CHEST) is a 7000-patient, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) to normal saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care patients. The trial design is based on the Saline Versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation (SAFE) study and will be the largest fluid resuscitation trial conducted to date.

OBJECTIVE

In accordance with two other trials conducted by the investigators, a predetermined statistical analysis plan (SAP) has been described and made public before completion of patient recruitment and data collection. The SAP will be adhered to for the final data analysis of this trial to avoid analysis bias arising from knowledge of study findings.

METHODS

The SAP was designed by the chief investigators and statisticians and approved by the CHEST Management Committee. All authors were blind to treatment allocation and to the unblinded data produced during two interim analyses conducted by the Data Safety and Monitoring Board. The data shells were produced from a previously published protocol. Statistical analyses are described in broad detail. Specifically, information relevant to baseline characteristics and processes of care were defined, and statistically relevant descriptive elements described, with appropriate comparisons between groups. Trial outcomes were selected, categorised into primary, secondary and tertiary outcomes, and appropriate statistical comparisons between groups were planned and described.

RESULTS

A standard SAP for CHEST was developed. A trial profile outline and list of mock tables were produced. Descriptions of analyses of baseline characteristics, processes of care, measures of efficacy and outcomes were described. Six prespecified subgroups were defined and statistical comparisons between groups in these subgroups were described. In addition, analyses of tertiary outcomes, including health economic and functional outcome assessment, were described.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a predetermined SAP for CHEST. This plan accords with high-quality standards of internal validity to minimise analysis bias.

摘要

背景

晶体液与羟乙基淀粉试验(CHEST)是一项纳入 7000 例患者的多中心、随机对照试验,旨在比较 6%羟乙基淀粉(130/0.4)与生理盐水在重症监护患者液体复苏中的作用。该试验设计基于生理盐水与白蛋白液评价(SAFE)研究,并将成为迄今为止进行的最大规模的液体复苏试验。

目的

根据研究者开展的另外两项试验,在完成患者招募和数据收集之前,已经描述并公开了一份预先确定的统计分析计划(SAP)。为避免因了解研究结果而导致分析偏倚,本试验将严格按照 SAP 进行最终数据分析。

方法

SAP 由首席研究者和统计学家设计,并由 CHEST 管理委员会批准。所有作者在两次由数据安全和监测委员会进行的期中分析中均对治疗分配和盲法数据不知情。数据汇总表是根据先前发表的方案生成的。统计分析有广泛详细的描述。具体而言,定义了与基线特征和治疗过程相关的信息,并对组间的统计相关描述性元素进行了描述,同时对试验结局进行了选择,将其分为主要结局、次要结局和次要结局,并对组间的适当统计比较进行了计划和描述。

结果

制定了 CHEST 的标准 SAP。制作了试验概况大纲和模拟表格列表。描述了基线特征、治疗过程、疗效评估指标和结局的分析。定义了 6 个预设亚组,并对这些亚组中的组间统计比较进行了描述。此外,还描述了包括卫生经济学和功能结局评估在内的三级结局分析。

结论

我们制定了 CHEST 的预先确定的 SAP。该计划符合内部有效性的高质量标准,可最大程度地减少分析偏倚。

相似文献

1
Statistical analysis plan for the Crystalloid Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial (CHEST).晶体液与羟乙基淀粉试验(CHEST)的统计分析计划。
Crit Care Resusc. 2012 Mar;14(1):44-52.
2
Statistical analysis plan for the Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial.脓毒性休克重症患者辅助性皮质类固醇治疗(ADRENAL)试验的统计分析计划
Crit Care Resusc. 2017 Jun;19(2):183-191.
3
Individual patient data comparative analysis of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 v 4% albumin for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients: statistical analysis plan.危重症患者液体复苏中羟乙基淀粉130/0.4与4%白蛋白的个体患者数据对比分析:统计分析计划
Crit Care Resusc. 2014 Sep;16(3):206-13.
4
Individual patient data meta-analysis of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4-0.42 versus crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis: a statistical analysis plan.羟乙基淀粉 130/0.4-0.42 与晶体液用于严重脓毒症患者液体复苏的个体患者数据荟萃分析:统计分析计划。
Crit Care Resusc. 2014 Jun;16(2):96-103.
5
The Australasian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation (ARISE) trial statistical analysis plan.《澳大利亚脓毒症复苏评估(ARISE)试验统计分析计划》。
Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Sep;15(3):162-71.
6
Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation trial statistical analysis plan.澳大利亚复苏脓毒症评估试验统计分析计划。
Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Oct;25(5):406-15. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12116. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
7
The NICE-SUGAR (Normoglycaemia in Intensive Care Evaluation and Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation) Study: statistical analysis plan.NICE-SUGAR(利用血糖算法调控进行重症监护评估及生存的正常血糖)研究:统计分析计划
Crit Care Resusc. 2009 Mar;11(1):46-57.
8
The RENAL (Randomised Evaluation of Normal vs. Augmented Level of Replacement Therapy) study: statistical analysis plan.肾脏(正常与强化替代治疗水平的随机评估)研究:统计分析计划。
Crit Care Resusc. 2009 Mar;11(1):58-66.
9
Effect of baseline serum albumin concentration on outcome of resuscitation with albumin or saline in patients in intensive care units: analysis of data from the saline versus albumin fluid evaluation (SAFE) study.基线血清白蛋白浓度对重症监护病房患者使用白蛋白或生理盐水进行复苏结局的影响:盐水与白蛋白液体评估(SAFE)研究数据分析
BMJ. 2006 Nov 18;333(7577):1044. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38985.398704.7C. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
10
Statistical analysis plan for the HEAT trial: a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous paracetamol in intensive care unit patients with fever and infection.HEAT 试验的统计分析计划:一项在 ICU 发热感染患者中进行的静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚的多中心随机安慰剂对照试验。
Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Dec;15(4):279-86.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Adjunctive corticoSTEROIDs on clinical outcomes in severe Scrub typhus pneumonitis: ASTEROIDS study protocol - a randomised controlled trial.辅助性皮质类固醇对严重恙虫病肺炎临床结局的作用:ASTEROIDS研究方案——一项随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e104171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104171.
2
The Plasma-Lyte 148 versus Saline (PLUS) statistical analysis plan: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of the effect of intensive care fluid therapy on mortality.平衡液148与生理盐水(PLUS)统计分析计划:一项关于重症监护液体疗法对死亡率影响的多中心随机对照试验。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):24-31. doi: 10.51893/2021.1.OA2. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people.
胶体液与晶体液用于危重症患者的液体复苏
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 3;8(8):CD000567. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub7.
4
Low-volume resuscitation with normal saline is associated with microvascular endothelial dysfunction after hemorrhage in rats, compared to colloids and balanced crystalloids.与胶体和平衡晶体液相比,低容量生理盐水复苏与大鼠出血后微血管内皮功能障碍有关。
Crit Care. 2017 Jun 29;21(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1745-7.
5
Goal-Directed Resuscitation Aiming Cardiac Index Masks Residual Hypovolemia: An Animal Experiment.以心脏指数为目标的导向性复苏掩盖了残余低血容量:一项动物实验。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:160979. doi: 10.1155/2015/160979. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
6
The HONEYPOT randomized controlled trial statistical analysis plan.HONEYPOT 随机对照试验统计分析计划。
Perit Dial Int. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(4):426-35. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00310.
7
0.9 % saline vs 6 % HES 130/0.4 for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.0.9%生理盐水与6%羟乙基淀粉130/0.4用于重症患者的液体复苏
Intern Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;8(4):347-8. doi: 10.1007/s11739-013-0938-6. Epub 2013 Apr 12.