• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用和不使用MTA作为根尖屏障的ThermaFil充填技术的根尖封闭和根尖周挤出比较:一项体外研究。

Comparison of apical sealing and periapical extrusion of the ThermaFil obturation technique with and without MTA as an apical barrier: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Kumar Satish, Deshpande S J, Rao Ajay Singh

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, HKE's S N Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;22(5):622-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.93445.

DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.93445
PMID:22406702
Abstract

AIM

The aim of the study was to compare the conventional ThermaFil obturation technique and ThermaFil obturation with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) as an apical barrier, with regard to apical sealing and extrusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty extracted human canines were instrumented using a crown-down technique and divided into two groups. The experimental group was obturated using ThermaFil obturation with MTA as an apical barrier and the control group was obturated using the conventional ThermaFil obturation technique. AH Plus sealer was used in both the groups. Apical extrusion was recorded. Teeth of both the groups were coated with nail polish, except for the apical 3 mm. After 24 h, they were suspended in black India ink for 48 h. Canines were decalcified, rendered transparent, and linear dye penetration was measured under ×40 stereomicroscope.

RESULTS

There was a significant extrusion noticed in conventional ThermaFil obturation technique. Frequency of extrusion of sealer and/or gutta-percha was supposed to be evaluated using χ² test, but since the values of the samples of ThermaFil plus MTA group were zero, statistical analysis could not be conducted, whereas linear dye leakage was calculated with Mann-Whitney U test because the distribution was abnormal.

CONCLUSION

Although ThermaFil plus MTA group showed microleakage, extrusion of sealer and the core material was prevented in comparison with conventional ThermaFil obturation technique. It is advantageous to use MTA as an apical plug as there is no fear of apical extrusion and the root canal system can then be packed three dimensionally against this barrier using any thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较传统热牙胶充填技术与以矿物三氧化物凝聚体(MTA)作为根尖屏障的热牙胶充填技术在根尖封闭性和充填材料挤出方面的差异。

材料与方法

选取20颗拔除的人犬齿,采用冠向深入技术进行根管预备,并分为两组。实验组采用以MTA作为根尖屏障的热牙胶充填,对照组采用传统热牙胶充填技术。两组均使用AH Plus封闭剂。记录根尖充填材料的挤出情况。两组牙齿除根尖3mm外均涂指甲油。24小时后,将其浸泡在黑色印度墨水中48小时。犬齿脱钙、透明化后,在×40体视显微镜下测量线性染料渗透情况。

结果

传统热牙胶充填技术中观察到明显的充填材料挤出。封闭剂和/或牙胶尖的挤出频率本应使用χ²检验进行评估,但由于热牙胶加MTA组样本值为零,无法进行统计分析,而线性染料渗漏采用Mann-Whitney U检验计算,因为其分布异常。

结论

虽然热牙胶加MTA组显示有微渗漏,但与传统热牙胶充填技术相比,可防止封闭剂和核心材料的挤出。使用MTA作为根尖堵塞物具有优势,因为无需担心根尖充填材料挤出,然后可以使用任何热塑牙胶充填技术对根管系统进行三维充填以抵住该屏障。

相似文献

1
Comparison of apical sealing and periapical extrusion of the ThermaFil obturation technique with and without MTA as an apical barrier: an in vitro study.使用和不使用MTA作为根尖屏障的ThermaFil充填技术的根尖封闭和根尖周挤出比较:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;22(5):622-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.93445.
2
A comparison of laterally condensed gutta-percha, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal filling materials.侧向加压热牙胶、热塑牙胶和三氧化矿物凝聚体作为根管充填材料的比较。
J Endod. 2004 Feb;30(2):103-6. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200402000-00010.
3
MTA and F-doped MTA cements used as sealers with warm gutta-percha. Long-term study of sealing ability.MTA 和 F 掺杂 MTA 水泥作为与热牙胶一起使用的密封剂。密封能力的长期研究。
Int Endod J. 2010 Oct;43(10):889-901. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01763.x. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
4
An in vitro comparison between the apical sealing abilities of resilon with Epiphany sealer and gutta-percha with AH plus sealer.Resilon与Epiphany封闭剂以及牙胶尖与AH plus封闭剂根尖封闭能力的体外比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):694. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107415.
5
Effect of three different sealers on the sealing ability of both thermafil obturators and cold laterally compacted Gutta-Percha.三种不同封闭剂对热牙胶充填器和冷侧方加压牙胶尖封闭能力的影响。
J Endod. 2002 Sep;28(9):638-42. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200209000-00003.
6
A comparison of apical sealing and extrusion between Thermafil and lateral condensation techniques.热牙胶垂直加压技术与侧方加压技术根尖封闭及牙胶尖挤出情况的比较
J Endod. 2001 Nov;27(11):670-2. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200111000-00004.
7
Comparative in vitro study of the sealing efficiency of white vs grey ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate formulas as apical barriers.白色与灰色ProRoot三氧化矿物凝聚体配方作为根尖屏障的封闭效率的体外比较研究。
Dent Traumatol. 2008 Apr;24(2):207-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00516.x.
8
The long-term sealing ability of AH 26 and AH plus used with three gutta-percha obturation techniques.AH 26和AH plus与三种牙胶尖充填技术联合使用时的长期封闭能力。
Quintessence Int. 2004 Apr;35(4):326-31.
9
Long-term sealing ability of Resilon apical root-end fillings.Resilon根尖根充材料的长期封闭能力。
Int Endod J. 2009 Oct;42(10):884-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01583.x.
10
Microleakage of resected MTA.切除的矿物三氧化物凝聚体的微渗漏
J Endod. 2002 Aug;28(8):573-4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200208000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Two Root Canal Filling Techniques: Obturation with Guttacore Carrier Based System and Obturation with Guttaflow2 Fluid Gutta-Percha.两种根管充填技术的比较:使用Guttacore载体系统进行根管充填与使用Guttaflow2流体牙胶进行根管充填。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Apr 15;10(4):71. doi: 10.3390/dj10040071.