School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
J Environ Manage. 2012 Jun 30;101:92-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
Discolouration of natural surface waters due to the humic component of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is a costly problem for water supply companies. This paper reviews what is known about the impacts of prescribed moorland vegetation burning on water colour. Relevant research has taken place at three scales: laboratory experiments on peat cores, plot scale sampling of soil waters and catchment scale sampling of stream waters. While laboratory studies suggest burning increases colour production, the evidence from catchment and plot studies is contradictory. Plot studies suggest colour production may decrease or remain unchanged following burning although there is evidence for some transient changes. Catchment studies suggest prescribed moorland burning causes stream water colour to increase, although in most cases the evidence is not clear cut since most studies could not clearly disentangle the effects of burning from those of vegetation cover. The differences in findings between plot and catchment studies may be explained by: i) the short-term nature of some studies which do not measure long-term response and recovery times to burning; ii) the lack of colour measurements from shallow soil depths which contribute more to streamflow than soil water from deeper in the peat; and iii) the possibility of hydrological interactions occurring between different experimental plots at some sites. Additionally, the increase in recent patch burning in some catchments that has been statistically attributed by some authors to increases in stream water colour cannot be reconciled with theoretical calculations. When dilution with waters derived from other parts of the catchment are taken into account, large values of colour have to be theoretically derived from those recently burnt areas that occupy a small proportion of the catchment area in order to balance the change in stream water colour observed in recent years. Therefore, much further process-based work is required to properly investigate whether prescribed vegetation burning is a direct driver of enhanced colour and DOC in upland streams, rivers and lakes.
天然地表水中的腐殖质成分溶解有机碳(DOC)导致的变色是供水公司面临的一个昂贵问题。本文综述了已有的关于规定的泥炭地植被燃烧对水色影响的研究。相关研究在三个尺度上进行:泥炭芯的实验室实验、土壤水的斑块尺度采样和溪流水的集水区尺度采样。虽然实验室研究表明燃烧会增加颜色的产生,但来自集水区和斑块研究的证据却是相互矛盾的。斑块研究表明,燃烧后颜色的产生可能减少或保持不变,尽管有一些短暂变化的证据。集水区研究表明,规定的泥炭地燃烧会导致溪流水中的颜色增加,但在大多数情况下,由于大多数研究无法清楚地区分燃烧和植被覆盖的影响,证据并不明确。斑块和集水区研究之间发现的差异可能可以用以下原因解释:i) 一些研究的短期性质,这些研究没有测量燃烧后的长期响应和恢复时间;ii) 缺乏来自浅层土壤的颜色测量值,这些值比来自泥炭深处的土壤水对溪流流量的贡献更大;iii) 在一些地点,不同实验斑块之间可能存在水文相互作用的可能性。此外,一些作者认为某些集水区中最近的斑块燃烧增加是导致溪流水颜色增加的原因,但这与理论计算并不相符。当考虑到从集水区其他部分获得的水的稀释时,必须从理论上推导出近年来燃烧的小部分区域的大颜色值,以便平衡近年来观察到的溪流水颜色的变化。因此,为了正确调查规定的植被燃烧是否是高地溪流、河流和湖泊中增强的颜色和 DOC 的直接驱动因素,还需要进行更多基于过程的研究。