Ellenrieder Martin, Steinhauser Erwin, Bader Rainer, Mittelmeier Wolfram
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
J Orthop Sci. 2012 May;17(3):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0201-4. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
Stress shielding and nonphysiological load transfer after primary or revision total hip replacement (THR) prepare the ground for resorptive bone remodeling. The quality of the bone stock influences the risk of periprosthetic fractures and the severity of future revision surgeries. The question of whether or not bending stiffness and distal screw interlocking influence load transfer of a modular revision hip stem with a solid, hollow, and hollow-slotted stem extension led to the conception of this experimental study. The results were compared with a standard hip stem for primary THR.
Revision stems were implanted in photoelastically coated composite femora. Cortical strain mapping was conducted before and after insertion of the implants under standardized loading conditions, considering the relevant muscle forces. Statistical analysis was based on a 95% confidence interval and a variance analysis for repeated measurements.
Significant stress shielding was observed after insertion of all types of hip stems compared with the intact femora. There was also a marked difference between strain alterations induced by standard and revision hip stems. With revision stems, the most distinct stress shielding effects were registered with the solid stem extension, particularly in the femoral diaphysis. Distal interlocking screws only had a local action on strain pattern and tended to enhance stress shielding at the midstem area when using the more flexible components.
More flexible revision stems provide a cortical strain pattern of the femur closer to the preoperative status. This may reduce resorptive bone remodeling in the long term. However, any type of revision stem tested in this study caused higher stress shielding than the hip stem for primary THR, especially in the diaphyseal region medially and laterally. With sufficient proximal anchorage, the influence of distal interlocking screws on the femoral strain pattern was localized.
初次或翻修全髋关节置换术(THR)后出现的应力遮挡和非生理性负荷转移为吸收性骨重塑创造了条件。骨量质量会影响假体周围骨折的风险以及未来翻修手术的严重程度。关于实心、空心和空心开槽柄延伸的模块化翻修髋关节柄的弯曲刚度和远端螺钉锁定是否会影响负荷转移的问题,引发了本实验研究。将结果与初次THR的标准髋关节柄进行了比较。
将翻修柄植入光弹性涂层复合股骨中。在标准化负荷条件下,考虑相关肌肉力量,在植入物插入前后进行皮质应变映射。统计分析基于95%置信区间和重复测量的方差分析。
与完整股骨相比,所有类型的髋关节柄插入后均观察到明显的应力遮挡。标准髋关节柄和翻修髋关节柄引起的应变改变之间也存在显著差异。对于翻修柄,实心柄延伸的应力遮挡效应最为明显,尤其是在股骨干。远端锁定螺钉仅对应变模式有局部作用,并且在使用更灵活的部件时,往往会增强柄中部区域的应力遮挡。
更灵活的翻修柄可使股骨的皮质应变模式更接近术前状态。从长期来看,这可能会减少吸收性骨重塑。然而,本研究中测试的任何类型的翻修柄所导致的应力遮挡都高于初次THR的髋关节柄,尤其是在股骨干的内侧和外侧区域。在近端锚固充分的情况下,远端锁定螺钉对股骨应变模式的影响是局部性的。