Logan Jennifer L, Yang Jianji, Forrest Graeme
Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2012 Feb;40(1):75-80. doi: 10.3810/hp.2012.02.948.
Acute respiratory tract infections are usually caused by viruses and are self-limited in healthy adults. Providers frequently provide antibiotic prescriptions for sinusitis, bronchitis, pharyngitis, and nonspecific upper respiratory tract infections, despite no evidence of improved clinical outcomes. We sought to determine: 1) primary care providers' antibiotic prescribing practices for acute respiratory tract infections in low-risk outpatient veterans and 2) short-term health outcome differences between those receiving and not receiving an antibiotic prescription.
We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review for veterans presenting to 1 of 3 primary care outpatient Veterans Affairs clinics in Portland, OR between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009 for acute respiratory symptoms. Demographics, signs and symptoms, antibiotic prescriptions, nonantibiotic prescriptions, and laboratory and imaging study variables were abstracted from medical charts. Descriptive frequencies, bivariate analyses (t tests, rank sums, Chi square tests, and Fisher's exact tests), and multivariate analyses (logistic regression) were performed.
35.4% of patients received antibiotic prescriptions. Of those antibiotics, 87.8% were not indicated. Antibiotic regimen prescriptions varied widely for each diagnosis. Short-term outcomes of hospitalization, follow-up visits, later antibiotic prescriptions, and death at 30 days were not associated with receipt of antibiotics.
Many low-risk veterans received antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections despite guidelines indicating that symptomatic treatment is sufficient for most patients. Novel interventions are required to reduce unnecessary and potentially harmful antibiotic use for low-risk outpatients with acute respiratory complaints.
急性呼吸道感染通常由病毒引起,在健康成年人中具有自限性。尽管没有证据表明使用抗生素能改善临床结局,但医疗服务提供者经常为鼻窦炎、支气管炎、咽炎和非特异性上呼吸道感染开具抗生素处方。我们试图确定:1)初级保健提供者对低风险门诊退伍军人急性呼吸道感染的抗生素处方做法;2)接受和未接受抗生素处方者的短期健康结局差异。
我们对2008年7月1日至2009年6月30日期间到俄勒冈州波特兰市3家退伍军人事务初级保健门诊之一就诊的有急性呼吸道症状的退伍军人进行了回顾性电子病历审查。从病历中提取人口统计学信息、体征和症状、抗生素处方、非抗生素处方以及实验室和影像学研究变量。进行了描述性频率分析、双变量分析(t检验、秩和检验、卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验)以及多变量分析(逻辑回归)。
35.4%的患者接受了抗生素处方。在这些抗生素中,87.8%并无用药指征。每种诊断的抗生素治疗方案处方差异很大。住院、随访、后续抗生素处方以及30天内死亡的短期结局与是否接受抗生素治疗无关。
尽管指南表明大多数患者进行对症治疗就足够了,但许多低风险退伍军人因急性呼吸道感染接受了抗生素治疗。需要采取新的干预措施,以减少对有急性呼吸道症状的低风险门诊患者不必要且可能有害的抗生素使用。