• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球对加强卫生系统的关注日益增加。

The emergence of global attention to health systems strengthening.

机构信息

Department of Public Administration and Policy, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2013 Jan;28(1):41-50. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs023. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czs023
PMID:22407017
Abstract

After a period of proliferation of disease-specific initiatives, over the past decade and especially since 2005 many organizations involved in global health have come to direct attention and resources to the issue of health systems strengthening. We explore how and why such attention emerged. A qualitative methodology, process-tracing, was used to construct a case history and analyse the factors shaping and inhibiting global political attention for health systems strengthening. We find that the critical factors behind the recent burst of attention include fears among global health actors that health systems problems threaten the achievement of the health-related Millennium Development Goals, concern about the adverse effects of global health initiatives on national health systems, and the realization among global health initiatives that weak health systems present bottlenecks to the achievement of their organizational objectives. While a variety of actors now embrace health systems strengthening, they do not constitute a cohesive policy community. Moreover, the concept of health systems strengthening remains vague and there is a weak evidence base for informing policies and programmes for strengthening health systems. There are several reasons to question the sustainability of the agenda. Among these are the global financial crisis, the history of pendulum swings in global health and the instrumental embrace of the issue by some actors.

摘要

经过一段时间的疾病专项倡议的发展,在过去十年中,尤其是自 2005 年以来,许多参与全球卫生的组织已经开始关注并投入资源加强卫生系统。我们探讨了这种关注是如何出现的,以及为什么会出现这种关注。采用定性方法,即过程追踪法,构建了一个案例历史,并分析了影响和制约全球卫生系统强化政治关注的因素。我们发现,最近关注热潮背后的关键因素包括全球卫生行为者担心卫生系统问题威胁到与卫生相关的千年发展目标的实现,担心全球卫生倡议对国家卫生系统的不利影响,以及全球卫生倡议认识到薄弱的卫生系统是实现其组织目标的瓶颈。虽然现在有各种各样的行为者支持加强卫生系统,但他们并没有形成一个凝聚力强的政策共同体。此外,加强卫生系统的概念仍然模糊,而且缺乏有力的证据基础来为加强卫生系统的政策和方案提供信息。该议程的可持续性存在几个问题,其中包括全球金融危机、全球卫生领域的钟摆摆动历史以及一些行为者对该问题的工具性接受。

相似文献

1
The emergence of global attention to health systems strengthening.全球对加强卫生系统的关注日益增加。
Health Policy Plan. 2013 Jan;28(1):41-50. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs023. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
2
Financing of health systems to achieve the health Millennium Development Goals in low-income countries.卫生系统筹资以实现低收入国家的卫生千年发展目标。
Lancet. 2010 Jan 30;375(9712):419-26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61833-X.
3
Critical interactions between Global Fund-supported programmes and health systems: a case study in Papua New Guinea.全球基金支持项目与卫生系统的关键互动:以巴布亚新几内亚为例的案例研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Nov;25 Suppl 1:i48-52. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq058.
4
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs): a global policy paradox.千年发展目标(MDGs):一个全球政策悖论。
Healthc Q. 2008;11(1):126-8, 4.
5
International institutions, global health initiatives and the challenge of sustainability: lessons from the Brazilian AIDS programme.国际机构、全球卫生倡议与可持续性挑战:巴西艾滋病规划的经验教训。
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Jan;15(1):5-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02411.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
6
[The Global Fund to fight HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria 5-y: evaluation policy issues].[抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾全球基金5年:评估政策问题]
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2010 May;103(2):119-22. doi: 10.1007/s13149-010-0051-2. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
7
Informed choices for attaining the Millennium Development Goals: towards an international cooperative agenda for health-systems research.实现千年发展目标的明智选择:迈向卫生系统研究国际合作议程。
Lancet. 2004;364(9438):997-1003. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17026-8.
8
An assessment of interactions between global health initiatives and country health systems.对全球卫生倡议与国家卫生系统之间相互作用的评估。
Lancet. 2009 Jun 20;373(9681):2137-69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60919-3.
9
Forging partnerships to solve the global health workforce crisis and achieve the health MDGs.建立伙伴关系以解决全球卫生人力危机并实现卫生千年发展目标。
World Hosp Health Serv. 2010;46(3):16-9.
10
Sub-Saharan Africa and the health MDGs: the need to move beyond the "quick impact" model.撒哈拉以南非洲与卫生千年发展目标:超越“快速影响”模式的必要性。
Reprod Health Matters. 2011 Nov;19(38):42-55. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(11)38579-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Home Physical Exercise Interventions in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Multivariate Meta-Analysis.慢性非特异性下腰痛的家庭体育锻炼干预:系统评价与多变量Meta分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 22;13(17):2094. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172094.
2
Ideas matter: An analysis of the effects of framing on health system strengthening in Zimbabwe.观念很重要:对框架构建对津巴布韦卫生系统强化影响的分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Sep 2;23(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01327-7.
3
Exploring health system challenges and gaps for crisis response in Ethiopia: a scoping review of publications and reports from 2020-2024.
探索埃塞俄比亚卫生系统应对危机的挑战与差距:对2020 - 2024年出版物和报告的范围审查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):928. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13084-y.
4
Power dynamics and intersectoral collaboration for health in low and middle income countries: A realist review.低收入和中等收入国家卫生领域的权力动态与部门间合作:一项现实主义综述
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Apr 5. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf022.
5
'Show me the money': An analysis of US global health funding from 1995 to 2019.“拿钱来”:1995 年至 2019 年美国全球卫生资金分析。
J Glob Health. 2024 Oct 25;14:04173. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04173.
6
Holy grail or convenient excuse? Stakeholder perspectives on the role of health system strengthening evaluation in global health resource allocation.圣杯还是方便的借口?利益相关者对加强卫生系统评估在全球卫生资源分配中的作用的看法。
Global Health. 2024 Oct 24;20(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01080-6.
7
Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the association between socioeconomic development and health policy attention: a geographically and temporally weighted regression modeling study in China.社会经济发展与卫生政策关注度的时空异质性关联:基于中国时空加权回归模型的研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 27;12:1338142. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1338142. eCollection 2024.
8
Beyond objective metrics: A comparative analysis of health care systems incorporating subjective dimensions to improve comparability of access and equity in healthcare assessments.超越客观指标:纳入主观维度的医疗保健系统的比较分析,以提高医疗保健评估中可及性和公平性的可比性。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0304834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304834. eCollection 2024.
9
Why does a public health issue (not) get priority? Agenda setting for the national burns programme in India.为什么一个公共卫生问题(没有)得到优先重视?印度国家烧伤计划的议程设置。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 May 15;39(5):457-468. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae019.
10
Investigating the citing communities around three leading health-system frameworks.调查围绕三个主要卫生系统框架的引用群体。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 26;22(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01075-6.