Department of Animal Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0038, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2012 Aug;90(8):2818-25. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4722. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
As the dairy industry continues to grow, more dairy calves are available for dairy, beef, and veal purposes. Rearing systems must be highly efficient to make this industry cost efficient, making the evaluation of rearing methods important to establish the most practical method. A study was designed and conducted to evaluate effects of housing and feeding systems on performance of neonatal Holstein bull calves. Treatments (2 × 2 factorial arrangement) consisted of: 1) individually housed, bottle-fed (n = 5 bull calves); 2) individually housed, bucket-fed (n = 5 bull calves); 3) group-housed, bottle-fed (n = 5 pens; 4 bull calves/pen); and 4) group-housed, bucket- (trough) fed (n = 5 pens; 3 or 4 bull calves/pen). Feeding treatments began on d 7 when calves had been acclimated to their new environment. Body weight measurements were collected every 7 d and blood samples were collected on d 0, 28, 55, and 66 for β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) concentration as a gross indicator of ruminal development. No housing × feeding interactions or feeding treatment effects were observed (P > 0.10). Average DMI (dry feed plus milk replacer) was increased (P < 0.05) for group-housed vs. individual animals after d 41, and final BW was greater (P < 0.05) for group-housed calves compared with individually housed calves. Feed efficiency and ADG, however, remained similar (P > 0.10) for all treatments. Fecal scores (P > 0.26), CV for BW (P > 0.26), and BHBA concentrations (P > 0.14) showed no differences among treatments. Housing system had greater effect on calf performance compared with milk feeding regimen.
随着乳制品行业的持续发展,更多的奶牛犊牛可用于乳制品、牛肉和小牛肉生产。饲养系统必须高效,才能使该行业具有成本效益,因此评估饲养方法对于确定最实用的方法非常重要。本研究旨在评估牛舍和饲养系统对新生荷斯坦公牛犊牛性能的影响。处理(2×2 析因设计)包括:1)单独饲养、奶瓶喂养(n = 5 头公牛犊牛);2)单独饲养、桶喂(n = 5 头公牛犊牛);3)群养、奶瓶喂养(n = 5 个栏;每栏 4 头公牛犊牛);4)群养、桶喂(食槽)(n = 5 个栏;每栏 3 或 4 头公牛犊牛)。犊牛适应新环境后,从第 7 天开始进行喂养处理。每隔 7 天测量一次体重,在第 0、28、55 和 66 天采集血液样本,以 β-羟丁酸(BHBA)浓度作为瘤胃发育的总指标。未观察到牛舍×饲养互作或饲养处理效应(P>0.10)。与单独饲养的动物相比,群养的动物在第 41 天后的平均干饲料+牛奶代用品采食量(DMI)增加(P<0.05),并且与单独饲养的犊牛相比,群养的犊牛的最终体重更大(P<0.05)。然而,所有处理的饲料效率和 ADG 仍然相似(P>0.10)。粪便评分(P>0.26)、体重 CV(P>0.26)和 BHBA 浓度(P>0.14)在处理之间没有差异。与牛奶喂养方案相比,牛舍系统对犊牛性能的影响更大。