• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚医疗器械监管:安全有效吗?

Medical device regulation in Australia: safe and effective?

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2012 Mar 5;196(4):256-60. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11261.

DOI:10.5694/mja11.11261
PMID:22409692
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency, characteristics and outcomes of reports of possible harms related to medical devices submitted to the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) using data made publicly available on the TGA website.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective analysis, conducted in January 2012, of data made publicly available on the TGA website from January 2000 to December 2011.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number and nature of reports of medical device incidents, recalls and alerts.

RESULTS

Up to December 2011, 6812 incidents involving medical devices were reported to the TGA, although there were several periods where data were unavailable. Incidents were reported more frequently in later years, most often by device sponsors, and were often attributed to mechanical problems. 295 deaths and 2357 serious injuries have been related to incidents, with serious injury (597) highest in 2009. Most incidents involving medical devices were not investigated (47.5%), or, after investigation, no further action was taken (25.0%). During the same time period, there were 35 medical device recalls and 34 medical device alerts issued by the TGA, with no consistent increase over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite TGA reform proposals, greater transparency is still needed. Issues that have not been addressed include patchy and conflicting data in the public domain and lack of explanations for the large proportion of uninvestigated reports. To maintain public confidence in the national regulatory system these problems need to be resolved.

摘要

目的

描述澳大利亚治疗商品管理局(TGA)网站上公布的与医疗器械相关的可能危害报告的频率、特征和结果,这些报告是使用公开数据进行的。

设计和设置

2012 年 1 月,对 TGA 网站上 2000 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月期间公布的数据进行了回顾性分析。

主要观察指标

医疗器械事件、召回和警示报告的数量和性质。

结果

截至 2011 年 12 月,TGA 共收到 6812 起涉及医疗器械的事件报告,但有几个时期的数据不可用。事件报告在近年来更为频繁,主要由设备赞助商报告,通常归因于机械问题。与事件相关的有 295 人死亡和 2357 人严重受伤,2009 年严重受伤(597 人)最高。大多数涉及医疗器械的事件未进行调查(47.5%),或在调查后未采取进一步行动(25.0%)。同期,TGA 共发布了 35 次医疗器械召回和 34 次医疗器械警示,没有随时间的一致性增加。

结论

尽管 TGA 提出了改革建议,但仍需要更大的透明度。尚未解决的问题包括公共领域数据的不完整和相互矛盾,以及对未调查报告的很大比例缺乏解释。为了维护公众对国家监管系统的信心,这些问题需要得到解决。

相似文献

1
Medical device regulation in Australia: safe and effective?澳大利亚医疗器械监管:安全有效吗?
Med J Aust. 2012 Mar 5;196(4):256-60. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11261.
2
Comparison of rates of safety issues and reporting of trial outcomes for medical devices approved in the European Union and United States: cohort study.欧盟和美国批准的医疗器械安全问题发生率及试验结果报告的比较:队列研究。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 28;353:i3323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3323.
3
Overview of high-risk medical device recalls in obstetrics and gynecology from 2002 through 2016: implications for device safety.2002年至2016年妇产科高风险医疗器械召回概述:对器械安全性的影响
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):42-46.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 May 10.
4
Incremental Revisions across the Life Span of Ophthalmic Devices after Initial Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval, 1979-2015.1979 年至 2015 年初始食品和药物管理局上市前批准后眼科设备寿命期间的增量修订。
Ophthalmology. 2017 Aug;124(8):1237-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.040. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Safe Medical Devices Act: management guidance for hospital compliance with the new FDA requirements.《安全医疗器械法案》:医院遵守美国食品药品监督管理局新要求的管理指南
Hosp Technol Ser. 1993 Oct;12(11):1-27.
6
Medical device recalls from 2004 to 2006: a focus on Class I recalls.2004年至2006年的医疗器械召回情况:聚焦于I类召回
Food Drug Law J. 2007;62(3):581-92.
7
User reporting of medical device related incidents.用户对医疗器械相关事件的报告。
Med Device Technol. 2003 May;14(4):26-9.
8
Medical device reporting: the US final rule.医疗器械报告:美国最终规则。
Med Device Technol. 1996 Mar;7(2):14-6, 18, 20-1.
9
Software-related recalls: an analysis of records.与软件相关的召回:记录分析
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2013 Nov-Dec;47(6):514-22. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-47.6.514.
10
Medical Device Recalls in Radiation Oncology: Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Data, 2002-2015.放射肿瘤学中的医疗器械召回:对美国食品药品监督管理局2002 - 2015年数据的分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):438-446. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Medical Device Safety: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Regulatory Directions.医疗器械安全导航:现状、挑战及未来监管方向
Drug Saf. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01599-6.
2
Role of materiovigilance in COVID era: An update.药物警戒在新冠疫情时代的作用:最新进展
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Jul;10(7):2722-2723. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2499_20. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
3
Challenges Associated with the Safety Signal Detection Process for Medical Devices.与医疗器械安全信号检测过程相关的挑战。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2021 Feb 24;14:43-57. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S278868. eCollection 2021.
4
Should Medical Devices Be Regulated as Rigorously as Drugs?医疗设备的监管应与药品一样严格吗?
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Sep-Oct;72(5):407-409. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
5
Materiovigilance: An Indian perspective.药物警戒:印度视角
Perspect Clin Res. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):175-178. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_26_18.
6
Joint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses.联合注册研究方法识别异常假体。
Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):348-52. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.831320.