• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部涂抹药膏或烧灼术对儿童复发性鼻出血哪种更有效?

Is local ointment or cauterization more effective in childhood recurrent epistaxis.

作者信息

Ozmen Süay, Ozmen Omer Afşin

机构信息

Inegöl Government Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology Clinics, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jun;76(6):783-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.040. Epub 2012 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.040
PMID:22409966
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of nasal antiseptic ointment and silver nitrate cautery in the treatment of children with recurrent epistaxis.

METHODS

In this prospective and randomized study, a hundred children with recurrent epistaxis were assigned into two groups. In group 1, patients underwent silver nitrate cauterization, in group 2 patients were treated with nasal antiseptic ointment (oxytetracycline hydrochloride-polymyxin B sulfate); and both groups were followed for 3 months. All of the patients were investigated for allergy with skin prick test.

RESULTS

The ages of patients were similar in both groups (group 1: 9.2±2.7; group 2: 8.2±2.2; p=0.069). Thirty-eight percent of the patients in group 1 and 52% of the patients in group 2 had epistaxis in the three months follow-up. The difference between groups was not significant (p=0.159). Thirteen (26%) of the patients in group 1 and 12 (24%) of the patients in group 2 were found to have allergic symptoms and positive prick test. The rate of allergy was similar in both groups (p=0.817).

CONCLUSION

Nasal antiseptic ointment and silver nitrate cauterization were found to have similar outcomes in the treatment of recurrent epistaxis.

摘要

目的

比较鼻用抗菌软膏和硝酸银烧灼法治疗儿童复发性鼻出血的疗效。

方法

在这项前瞻性随机研究中,将100名复发性鼻出血患儿分为两组。第1组患者接受硝酸银烧灼治疗,第2组患者使用鼻用抗菌软膏(盐酸土霉素 - 硫酸多粘菌素B)治疗;两组均随访3个月。所有患者均通过皮肤点刺试验进行过敏调查。

结果

两组患者年龄相似(第1组:9.2±2.7;第2组:8.2±2.2;p = 0.069)。在3个月的随访中,第1组38%的患者和第2组52%的患者出现鼻出血。两组之间的差异不显著(p = 0.159)。第1组13名(26%)患者和第2组12名(24%)患者被发现有过敏症状且点刺试验呈阳性。两组的过敏率相似(p = 0.817)。

结论

发现鼻用抗菌软膏和硝酸银烧灼法在治疗复发性鼻出血方面有相似的效果。

相似文献

1
Is local ointment or cauterization more effective in childhood recurrent epistaxis.局部涂抹药膏或烧灼术对儿童复发性鼻出血哪种更有效?
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jun;76(6):783-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.040. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
2
Prospective double blind randomized clinical trial comparing 75% versus 95% silver nitrate cauterization in the management of idiopathic childhood epistaxis.一项前瞻性双盲随机临床试验,比较75%与95%硝酸银烧灼法治疗儿童特发性鼻出血的效果。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jan;75(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
3
Bilateral simultaneous nasal septal cauterization in children with recurrent epistaxis.双侧同时对复发性鼻出血儿童进行鼻中隔烧灼术。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Oct;73(10):1390-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.06.023. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
4
A double-blind randomized controlled trial of management of recurrent nosebleeds in children.一项关于儿童复发性鼻出血治疗的双盲随机对照试验。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 May;140(5):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
5
Local ointment versus cauterization in childhood recurrent epistaxis.儿童复发性鼻出血的局部软膏治疗与烧灼术治疗对比
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jul;76(7):1071-2; author reply 1072. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.03.029. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
6
Bilateral epistaxis in children: efficacy of bilateral septal cauterization with silver nitrate.儿童双侧鼻出血:硝酸银双侧鼻中隔烧灼术的疗效
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Aug;70(8):1439-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
7
The addition of silver nitrate cautery to antiseptic nasal cream for patients with epistaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.硝酸银烧灼术联合抗菌鼻用乳膏治疗鼻出血患者:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;138:110365. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110365. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
8
Microwave ablation versus silver nitrate cautery for treating recurrent epistaxis in adolescents: A prospective, randomized case-control study.微波消融术与硝酸银烧灼术治疗青少年复发性鼻出血的前瞻性随机对照研究
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jun;121:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
9
A randomised clinical trial of antiseptic nasal carrier cream and silver nitrate cautery in the treatment of recurrent anterior epistaxis.抗菌鼻腔载体乳膏与硝酸银烧灼术治疗复发性前鼻出血的随机临床试验
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999 Jun;24(3):228-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00236.x.
10
A Comparison of Bipolar Electrocautery and Chemical Cautery for Control of Pediatric Recurrent Anterior Epistaxis.双极电凝术与化学烧灼术治疗小儿复发性前鼻出血的比较
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov;153(5):851-6. doi: 10.1177/0194599815589583. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Bepanthen and dexpanthenol on human nasal ciliary beat frequency in vitro.贝复舒和地夸磷索对体外人鼻纤毛摆动频率的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug;280(8):3731-3736. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07916-y. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Medical Management in Pediatric Patients with Idiopathic Recurrent Epistaxis.鼻内药物治疗小儿特发性复发性鼻出血的疗效与安全性
Medeni Med J. 2020;35(1):1-7. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2020.78614. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
3
Comparison of topical treatment methods used in recurrent anterior epistaxis: a randomized clinical trial.
比较复发性前鼻出血局部治疗方法: 一项随机临床试验。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar-Apr;87(2):132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
4
Nasal Bacterial Colonization in Pediatric Epistaxis: The Role of Topical Antibacterial Treatment.小儿鼻出血中的鼻腔细菌定植:局部抗菌治疗的作用
Balkan Med J. 2016 Mar;33(2):212-5. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.151239. Epub 2016 Mar 1.