Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldinger Straße, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug;280(8):3731-3736. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07916-y. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
Dexpanthenol-containing ointments/fluids are recommended to restore impaired nasal mucosa. To date, there are no data about the influence of dexpanthenol or formulations including dexpanthenol on ciliary beat frequency (CBF) of nasal epithelial cells.
We tested the ciliary beat frequency of human nasal epithelial cells in RPMI 1640 cell solution using in vitro high-frequency video microscopy every 60 s over a period of 15 min (min). Bepanthen solution and dexpanthenol in two clinically relevant concentrations (1.67% and 3.33%) were added to the cells. Addition of sterile water served as control group. To get a better overview, the measurements after 1 min, 5 min and 15 min were combined.
The CBF in the control group (n = 17) after 15 min was 7.3 ± 2.6 Hz. In comparison, the CBF after 15 min was 1.8 ± 1.0 Hz in the 3.33% Bepanthen group (n = 17) and 3.2 ± 1.2 Hz in the 1.67% group, which was statistically significantly lower in both groups (p < 0.001). With regard to the dexpanthenol group (n = 17) a CBF of 6.0 ± 2.6 Hz with 3.33% and 6.1 ± 2.4 Hz with 1.67% dexpanthenol, was detected, which was again statistically significantly lower (p = 0.06) compared to the control group except CBF at 15 min with 1.57% (n = 17; p = 0.04). In general, the effect on CBF was less pronounced with dexpanthenol compared with Bepanthen with a statistically significant difference between the two formulations. The results were verified by calculating an analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Bepanthen as an ointment, solution or inhalation is commonly used in ENT for mucosal care. Our results have shown that both substances reduce CBF in clinically relevant concentrations, although the effect was more pronounced with Bepanthen compared to dexpanthenol solution, which could be related to additives or change of physical properties in the solution. Further research is needed to assess potential clinical relevance.
含有泛醇的软膏/溶液被推荐用于恢复受损的鼻黏膜。迄今为止,尚无关于泛醇或包含泛醇的制剂对鼻上皮细胞纤毛摆动频率(CBF)的影响的数据。
我们使用体外高频视频显微镜,在 RPMI 1640 细胞溶液中每 60 秒测试一次人类鼻上皮细胞的纤毛摆动频率,持续 15 分钟(min)。向细胞中加入两种临床相关浓度(1.67%和 3.33%)的贝坦溶液和泛醇。无菌水的添加作为对照组。为了获得更好的概述,将第 1 分钟、第 5 分钟和第 15 分钟的测量值结合起来。
对照组(n=17)在 15 分钟后的 CBF 为 7.3±2.6Hz。相比之下,在 3.33%贝坦组(n=17)中,15 分钟后 CBF 为 1.8±1.0Hz,在 1.67%组中为 3.2±1.2Hz,两组均明显较低(p<0.001)。在泛醇组(n=17)中,检测到 3.33%和 1.67%泛醇的 CBF 分别为 6.0±2.6Hz 和 6.1±2.4Hz,与对照组相比再次明显较低(p=0.06),除了 1.57%(n=17;p=0.04)在 15 分钟时的 CBF。一般来说,与贝坦相比,泛醇对 CBF 的影响较小,两种制剂之间存在统计学差异。通过计算方差分析(ANOVA)验证了这些结果。
贝坦作为一种软膏、溶液或吸入剂,在耳鼻喉科中常用于黏膜护理。我们的结果表明,这两种物质在临床相关浓度下均降低 CBF,尽管与泛醇溶液相比,贝坦的作用更为明显,这可能与溶液中的添加剂或物理性质的变化有关。需要进一步研究以评估潜在的临床相关性。