Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Dysphagia. 2012 Dec;27(4):514-20. doi: 10.1007/s00455-012-9402-4. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of two different modes (active and passive) of balloon dilatation therapy on cricopharyngeal dysfunction (CPD). Thirty-eight CPD patients with neurological disorders were recruited between 2006 and 2010. Twenty-one of them received active balloon dilatation therapy, and the remaining 17 received passive dilatation therapy for an average of 4 weeks. The patients' swallowing function before and after the intervention was evaluated using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening was studied with the videofluoroscopic swallow study. Both modes of balloon dilatation therapy yielded improvements in the FOIS (active group: z = -3.767, p < 0.001; passive group: z = -3.472, p < 0.001) and the UES opening (both groups: p < 0.01). Active dilatation showed a significantly better FOIS result (p = 0.028) than passive dilatation for CPD. Both active and passive balloon dilatation benefits patients with neurological disorders but active balloon dilatation is better.
本研究的主要目的是探讨两种不同模式(主动和被动)的球囊扩张治疗对环咽肌功能障碍(CPD)的疗效。2006 年至 2010 年间,共招募了 38 名患有神经障碍的 CPD 患者。其中 21 名患者接受主动球囊扩张治疗,其余 17 名患者接受被动扩张治疗,平均治疗时间为 4 周。干预前后,采用功能性口腔摄入量表(FOIS)评估患者的吞咽功能,采用荧光透视吞咽研究评估食管上括约肌(UES)开放情况。两种球囊扩张治疗模式均改善了 FOIS(主动组:z=-3.767,p<0.001;被动组:z=-3.472,p<0.001)和 UES 开放(两组:p<0.01)。主动扩张在改善 CPD 的 FOIS 结果方面明显优于被动扩张(p=0.028)。主动和被动球囊扩张均有益于神经障碍患者,但主动球囊扩张效果更好。