Reitz Randall, Common Kelly, Fifield Peter, Stiasny Eric
St. Mary's Family Medicine Residency.
Families First Health and Support Center.
Fam Syst Health. 2012 Mar;30(1):72-80. doi: 10.1037/a0027016.
Recent laws in the United States incent healthcare practices to adopt electronic health records (EHRs). While there is extensive research related to EHRs generally, there is a dearth of EHR research specific to collaborative care settings. This study reports responses from 101 collaborative care offices who completed a 13-question online survey. The mixed-methods analysis provides insights as to the satisfaction, obstacles, and solutions to interdisciplinary collaboration in the presence of an EHR. Respondents reported highest satisfaction with medical billing, interdisciplinary communication, and scheduling. Satisfaction was lower as it relates to time consumption, difficult learning curve, creation of appointment notes, and health registries. This research reveals varied and conflicting approaches to addressing confidentiality and HIPAA within the EHR. Recommendations for improving EHR to better support collaborative care include the addition of modules common in mental health-specific EHR, enhanced tracking of mental health outcomes, templates for joint appointments, and improvements in population-based registry functions.
美国近期的法律促使医疗保健机构采用电子健康记录(EHR)。虽然总体上有大量关于电子健康记录的研究,但针对协作式医疗环境的电子健康记录研究却很匮乏。本研究报告了101个协作式医疗办公室对一项包含13个问题的在线调查的回复。混合方法分析提供了有关在电子健康记录存在的情况下跨学科协作的满意度、障碍和解决方案的见解。受访者对医疗计费、跨学科沟通和日程安排的满意度最高。与时间消耗、学习曲线困难、创建预约记录和健康登记相关的满意度较低。这项研究揭示了在电子健康记录中处理保密性和《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)的各种相互冲突的方法。改进电子健康记录以更好地支持协作式医疗的建议包括增加心理健康专用电子健康记录中常见的模块、加强对心理健康结果的跟踪、联合预约模板以及改进基于人群的登记功能。