Kamara Stania, Singh Surinder
Primary Health Care BSc, University College London, Westminster, London, UK.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012 Apr;13(2):165-74. doi: 10.1017/S146342361100051X.
A transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is a strong predictor of future stroke. Stroke is the most common cause of mortality in the United Kingdom. Management of risk factors can reduce the possibility of future strokes; however, these are often difficult to achieve optimally. Current evidence suggests that beliefs about causal attributions, severity and perceived risk of stroke may influence uptake of secondary prevention activities amongst this patient group.
To explore the illness beliefs of patients about TIAs and future risk of stroke, and to determine whether these beliefs determine secondary stroke prevention activities.
A qualitative study comprising face-to-face, semi-structured interviews conducted in the homes of participants. Sampling was purposive and drawn from a single North London General Practice. A thematic framework analysis method was followed.
Eleven participants took part in the study (aged 46-86 years, three female participants and eight male participants). Time since diagnosis ranged from 2 to 25 years. There was a commonly held belief that TIAs are 'short-lived events' associated with full recovery, whereas strokes always lead to permanent 'disability'. Only those who believed their TIAs to be 'serious' undertook activities to prevent further recurrence. Concordance with medication was the most popular prevention activity.
The traditional medical definition of TIA and stroke do not reflect the views of patients who have had TIAs. One's perception of the severity of the initial TIA event and the risk of future stroke episodes may influence the uptake of secondary stroke prevention activities. Post TIA stroke prevention interventions should include tailored discussions focussing on the importance of the acute event and its implications for long-term health and future stroke risk.
短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)是未来发生中风的有力预测指标。中风是英国最常见的死亡原因。对风险因素的管理可以降低未来中风的可能性;然而,这些往往难以达到最佳效果。目前的证据表明,对因果归因、严重程度和中风感知风险的信念可能会影响该患者群体对二级预防活动的接受程度。
探讨患者对TIA及未来中风风险的疾病认知,并确定这些认知是否决定二级中风预防活动。
一项定性研究,包括在参与者家中进行的面对面、半结构化访谈。抽样是有目的的,来自伦敦北部的一家全科诊所。采用主题框架分析方法。
11名参与者参加了研究(年龄46 - 86岁,3名女性参与者和8名男性参与者)。诊断后的时间跨度为2至25年。普遍存在的一种观念是,TIA是与完全康复相关的“短暂事件”,而中风总是导致永久性“残疾”。只有那些认为自己的TIA“严重”的人才会采取措施预防进一步复发。坚持服药是最常见的预防活动。
TIA和中风的传统医学定义并未反映患有TIA的患者的观点。一个人对初始TIA事件严重程度和未来中风发作风险的认知可能会影响二级中风预防活动的接受程度。TIA后中风预防干预应包括针对性的讨论,重点关注急性事件的重要性及其对长期健康和未来中风风险的影响。