Department of Social Welfare Studies, H, Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 20;12:215. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-215.
Research regarding socio-economic differences in alcohol and drug use in adolescence yields mixed results. This study hypothesizes that (1) when using education type as a proxy of one's social status, clear differences will exist between students from different types of education, regardless of students' familial socio-economic background; (2) and that the effects of education type differ according to their cultural background.
Data from the Brussels youth monitor were used, a school survey administered among 1,488 adolescents from the 3rd to 6th year of Flemish secondary education. Data were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression models.
Controlling for their familial background, the results show that native students in lower educational tracks use alcohol and cannabis more often than students in upper educational tracks. Such a relationship was not found for students from another ethnic background.
Results from this study indicate that research into health risks should take into account both adolescents' familial background and individual social position as different components of youngsters' socio-economic background.
关于青少年在酒精和毒品使用方面的社会经济差异的研究结果喜忧参半。本研究假设:(1) 当使用教育类型作为一个人社会地位的代理时,无论学生的家庭社会经济背景如何,来自不同类型教育的学生之间都存在明显差异;(2) 并且教育类型的影响因文化背景而异。
本研究使用了布鲁塞尔青少年监测数据,这是一项在弗拉芒中等教育的第 3 至 6 年的 1488 名青少年中进行的学校调查。使用多层次逻辑回归模型对数据进行了分析。
在控制其家庭背景的情况下,结果表明,较低教育轨道的本地学生比较高教育轨道的学生更频繁地使用酒精和大麻。来自另一种族背景的学生则没有这种关系。
本研究的结果表明,健康风险研究应考虑青少年的家庭背景和个人社会地位,因为它们是年轻人社会经济背景的不同组成部分。