Suppr超能文献

功能性胸痛对生物反馈治疗有反应,但功能性烧心没有:有什么区别?

Functional chest pain responds to biofeedback treatment but functional heartburn does not: what is the difference?

机构信息

Institute of Gastroenterology, Liver Diseases, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jun;24(6):708-14. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283525a0c.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with functional esophageal disorders represent a challenging treatment group. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of biofeedback in the treatment of patients with functional esophageal disorders.

METHODS

In this prospective study, patients with typical/atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent upper endoscopy and 24-h pH monitoring. All patients filled out gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom, Hospital Anxiety and Depression, and Symptom Stress Rating questionnaires. Patients with functional heartburn and those with functional chest pain were offered biofeedback treatment. A global assessment questionnaire was filled out at the end of treatment and then 2.8 (range 1-4) years later.

RESULTS

From January 2006 to December 2009, 22 patients with functional esophageal diseases were included in the study. Thirteen had functional heartburn and nine had functional chest pain. Six patients from each group received biofeedback treatment. After treatment for 1-4 years, patients with functional chest pain showed significant improvements in symptoms compared with those who were not treated. Patients with functional heartburn showed no improvement. Patients with functional chest pain had a longer time of esophageal acid exposure than those with functional heartburn.

CONCLUSION

Patients with functional chest pain have different central and intraesophageal factors associated with symptom generation in comparison with patients with functional heartburn. Biofeedback is a useful tool in the treatment of patients with functional chest pain, but not for those with functional heartburn.

摘要

背景

功能性食管疾病患者是一个具有挑战性的治疗群体。本研究的目的是评估生物反馈在功能性食管疾病患者治疗中的作用。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,具有典型/非典型胃食管反流病症状的患者接受了上内窥镜检查和 24 小时 pH 监测。所有患者都填写了胃食管反流病症状、医院焦虑和抑郁、症状应激评分问卷。对功能性烧心和功能性胸痛患者提供生物反馈治疗。在治疗结束时和 2.8 年后(范围 1-4)填写一份总体评估问卷。

结果

从 2006 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月,研究纳入了 22 例功能性食管疾病患者。其中 13 例为功能性烧心,9 例为功能性胸痛。每组各有 6 名患者接受生物反馈治疗。经过 1-4 年的治疗,功能性胸痛患者的症状明显改善,而未接受治疗的患者则没有改善。功能性烧心患者没有改善。功能性胸痛患者的食管酸暴露时间长于功能性烧心患者。

结论

与功能性烧心患者相比,功能性胸痛患者与症状产生相关的中枢和食管内因素不同。生物反馈是治疗功能性胸痛患者的有用工具,但对功能性烧心患者无效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验