Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 May;41(5):1155-63. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr318. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
Brain damage is universal in the rare survivor of unwitnessed cardiac arrest. Non-pulsatile-controlled cerebral reperfusion offsets this damage, but may simultaneously cause brain oedema when delivered at the required the high mean perfusion pressure. This study analyses pulsatile perfusion first in control pigs and then using controlled reperfusion after prolonged normothermic brain ischaemia (simulating unwitnessed arrest) to determine if it might provide a better method of delivery for brain reperfusion.
Initial baseline studies during isolated brain perfusion in 12 pigs (six non-pulsatile and six pulsatile) examined high (750 cc/min) then low (450 cc/min) fixed flow before and after transient (30 s) ischaemia, while measuring brain vascular resistance and oxygen metabolism. Twelve subsequent pigs underwent 30 min of normothermic global brain ischaemia followed by either uncontrolled reperfusion with regular blood (n = 6) or pulsatile-controlled reperfusion (n = 6) before unclamping brain inflow vessels. Functional neurological deficit score (NDS; score: 0, normal; 500, brain death) was evaluated 24 h post-reperfusion.
High baseline flow rates with pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion before and after transient ischaemia maintained normal arterial pressures (90-100 mmHg), surface oxygen levels IN Vivo Optical Spectroscopy (INVOS) and oxygen uptake. In contrast, oxygen uptake fell after 30 s ischaemia at 450 cc/min non-pulsatile flow, but improved following pulsatile perfusion, despite its delivery at lower mean cerebral pressure. Uncontrolled (normal blood) reperfusion after 30 min of prolonged ischaemia, caused negligible INVOS O(2) uptake (<10-15%), raised conjugated dienes (CD; 1.75 ± 0.15 A(233 mn)), one early death, multiple seizures, high NDS (243 ± 16) and extensive cerebral infarcts (2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride stain) and oedema (84.1 ± 0.6%). Conversely, pulsatile-controlled reperfusion pigs exhibited normal O(2) uptake, low CD levels (1.31 ± 0.07 A(233 mn); P < 0.01 versus uncontrolled reperfusion), no seizures and a low NDS (32 ± 14; P < 0.001 versus uncontrolled reperfusion); three showed complete recovery (NDS = 0) and all could sit and eat. Post-mortem brain oedema was minimal (81.1 ± 0.5; P < 0.001 versus uncontrolled reperfusion) and no infarctions occurred.
Pulsatile perfusion lowers cerebral vascular resistance and improves global O(2) uptake to potentially offset post-ischaemic oedema following high-pressure reperfusion. The irreversible functional and anatomic damage that followed uncontrolled reperfusion after a 30-min warm global brain ischaemia interval was reversed by pulsatile-controlled reperfusion, as its delivery resulted in consistent near complete neurological recovery and absent brain infarction.
在未经目击的心脏骤停幸存者中,脑损伤普遍存在。非搏动性控制脑再灌注可减轻这种损伤,但在需要高平均灌注压时,可能会同时导致脑水肿。本研究首先在对照猪中分析搏动性灌注,然后在长时间的常温脑缺血(模拟未经目击的心脏骤停)后使用控制性再灌注,以确定它是否可以为脑再灌注提供更好的输送方法。
在 12 头猪(6 头非搏动性和 6 头搏动性)的孤立性脑灌注的初始基线研究中,在短暂(30 秒)缺血前后检查了高(750cc/min)和低(450cc/min)固定流量,同时测量脑血管阻力和氧代谢。随后的 12 头猪经历了 30 分钟的常温全脑缺血,然后进行未控制性再灌注(常规血液,n=6)或搏动性控制性再灌注(n=6),然后再松开脑流入血管。功能神经功能缺损评分(NDS;评分:0,正常;500,脑死亡)在再灌注后 24 小时进行评估。
搏动性和非搏动性灌注在短暂缺血前后的高基础流量率维持正常动脉压(90-100mmHg)、表面氧水平(INVOS)和氧摄取。相比之下,450cc/min 非搏动性流量的 30 秒缺血后,氧摄取下降,但搏动性灌注后改善,尽管其在较低的平均脑压下输送。30 分钟延长缺血后未控制性(常规血液)再灌注引起的 INVOS O(2)摄取可忽略不计(<10-15%),共轭二烯(CD)升高(1.75±0.15A(233mn)),1 例早期死亡,多次癫痫发作,NDS 高(243±16)和广泛脑梗死(2,3,5-三苯基氯化四唑染色)和水肿(84.1±0.6%)。相反,搏动性控制性再灌注猪表现出正常的 O(2)摄取,低 CD 水平(1.31±0.07A(233mn);与未控制性再灌注相比,P<0.01),无癫痫发作和低 NDS(32±14;与未控制性再灌注相比,P<0.001);3 头猪完全恢复(NDS=0),可坐可吃。死后脑水肿最小(81.1±0.5;与未控制性再灌注相比,P<0.001),无梗死发生。
搏动性灌注降低脑血管阻力并改善全身 O(2)摄取,以潜在减轻高压再灌注后缺血后水肿。在 30 分钟常温全脑缺血间隔后,未经控制的再灌注导致不可逆的功能和解剖损伤,而搏动性控制性再灌注可逆转这种损伤,因为其输送导致持续的近乎完全的神经恢复和无脑梗死。