Tomal Cíntia Reina Grisan, Silva Ana Gabriela Padua Dias da, Yamashita Américo Massafuni, Andrade Pamela Vieira de, Hirano Márcia Tamiko, Tardelli Maria Angela, Silva Helga Cristina Almeida
Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive-care Medicine Course, UniversidadeFederal de São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;62(2):154-72. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70115-0.
Due to its pharmacological characteristics, sevoflurane is the ideal anesthetic for short-duration procedures. There are two brands of sevoflurane in the Brazilian market, Sevocris® and Sevorane®, with different formulations and packaging. The objective of this study was to assess whether there are differences between the two anesthetics regarding induction, maintenance, recovery, and consumption.
One hundred and thirty children were included, divided into two groups according to the brand used: Group 1 was assigned to sevoflurane Cristália® and Group 2 to sevoflurane Abbott®. The following parameters were assessed: heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fraction of inspired and expired sevoflurane, BIS values, tympanic temperature, induction and recovery time, agitation upon awakening measured by the PAED scale, and anesthetic consumption by weighing the vaporizers. Anesthesia was induced with 1 MAC and increased every three breaths at 0.5 MAC, up to 3 MAC.
There was no difference between groups regarding the duration of the procedure, the anesthesia, and the parameters evaluated at induction. In Group 1, the number of children who required additional bolus of sevoflurane for anesthesia maintenance was higher than in Group 2 (p<0.05). The fraction of inspired and expired sevoflurane at the end of the procedure was lower in Group 1 (p<0.001). Upon awakening, BIS value was lower in Group 1 (p=0.045). Other parameters evaluated in recovery showed no difference between groups. The use of anesthesia was similar between groups.
由于其药理学特性,七氟醚是短时间手术的理想麻醉剂。巴西市场上有两种品牌的七氟醚,即Sevocris®和Sevorane®,其配方和包装不同。本研究的目的是评估这两种麻醉剂在诱导、维持、恢复和消耗量方面是否存在差异。
纳入130名儿童,根据使用的品牌分为两组:第1组使用Cristália®七氟醚,第2组使用Abbott®七氟醚。评估以下参数:心率、收缩压和舒张压、吸入和呼出七氟醚的分数、脑电双频指数(BIS)值、鼓膜温度、诱导和恢复时间、用小儿麻醉苏醒期躁动评分(PAED)量表测量的苏醒时躁动情况,以及通过称量蒸发器来计算麻醉剂消耗量。以1个最低肺泡有效浓度(MAC)诱导麻醉,每3次呼吸以0.5 MAC增加,直至3 MAC。
两组在手术持续时间、麻醉以及诱导时评估的参数方面没有差异。在第1组中,麻醉维持时需要额外推注七氟醚的儿童数量高于第2组(p<0.05)。手术结束时,第1组吸入和呼出七氟醚的分数较低(p<0.001)。苏醒时,第1组的BIS值较低(p=0.045)。恢复过程中评估的其他参数在两组之间没有差异。两组之间麻醉剂的使用情况相似。