Institute of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(5):537-51. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2012.674056. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
Research findings show that proposers make surprisingly fair offers in the ultimatum and dictator games, an observation that contradicts predictions of classical game theory. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study examines brain activities of proposers that contribute to fair and unfair behaviors. We hypothesized that egoistic and altruistic motives of proposers affect fairness differentially in the two games. fMRI analysis revealed that the 28% of fair offers in the present ultimatum game were related to enhanced activity in prefrontal areas, in particular, in regions involved in reward and theory of mind. This corroborates the idea that egoistic motives are primarily responsible for fair offers in this game, which we denote as strategic fairness. Fair offers in the dictator game, however, were related to increased activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex. This supports the idea that altruistic motives primarily drive fair offers in the dictator game, denoted here as altruistic fairness.
研究结果表明,在最后通牒和独裁者游戏中,提议者会出人意料地提出公平的报价,这一观察结果与经典博弈论的预测相悖。本功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究考察了提议者的大脑活动,这些活动促成了公平和不公平的行为。我们假设提议者的利己和利他动机在这两个游戏中对公平性的影响是不同的。fMRI 分析显示,在目前的最后通牒游戏中,28%的公平报价与前额叶区域的活动增强有关,特别是与奖励和心理理论相关的区域。这证实了这样一种观点,即利己动机主要负责该游戏中的公平报价,我们将其称为策略公平。然而,独裁者游戏中的公平报价与背侧前扣带皮层和后扣带皮层的活动增加有关。这支持了利他动机主要驱动独裁者游戏中公平报价的观点,我们在这里将其称为利他公平。