• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国非鼻咽癌高发地区以世卫组织 II 级为主的鼻咽癌患者接受调强放疗的临床转归。

Clinical outcome for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with predominantly WHO II histology treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in non-endemic region of China.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2012 Sep;48(9):864-9. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.03.001
PMID:22445296
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the primary treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in Northwest China, including assessments of failure patterns, toxicities and potential prognostic factors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2006 and June 2010, 193 newly diagnosed non-metastatic NPCs were treated by IMRT with simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) technique in Xijing Hospital of Northwest China. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was offered to 85.5% patients. Acute and late toxicities were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scoring criteria. Prognostic factors were assessed by univariate or multivariate analysis. Statistical analyses were performed on survival and failure patterns.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 34 months. WHO type II was the predominant histology for NPCs (69.9%) in our study group. Twelve patients experienced local regional failure and total distant metastasis occurred in 34 patients, representing the major mode of failure. The 3-year local recurrence-free (LRFS), regional recurrence-free (RRFS), distant metastasis-free (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 86.6%, 86.7%, 86.4%, and 85.7%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed N-classification, age (≤ 50 vs. >50) and WHO type (WHO II vs. WHO III) were independent predictors for DMFS, LRFS and OS. Tumor volume (≤ 50 cm(3) vs. >50 cm(3)) and presence of anemia were independent significant prognostic factors for profession-free survival (PFS). No significant difference was observed between different T categories. Acute and late toxicities were mild or moderate. No grade IV toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

WHO II was the predominant histology and a significant poor prognostic factor in our study group, indicating different carcinogenetic pathways of NPC between endemic and non-endemic regions. Our experience of using IMRT in the treatment of NPC in non-endemic region showed excellent locoregional control and favorable toxicity profiles.

摘要

目的

评估在中国西北地区使用调强放疗(IMRT)对鼻咽癌(NPC)进行原发治疗的临床结果,包括对失败模式、毒性和潜在预后因素的评估。

方法与材料

在 2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 6 月期间,193 例新诊断的非转移性 NPC 患者在西北西京医院接受了调强放疗同步整合增敏(SIB)技术治疗。85.5%的患者接受了顺铂为基础的化疗。急性和晚期毒性根据放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)评分标准进行分级。通过单变量或多变量分析评估预后因素。对生存和失败模式进行统计分析。

结果

中位随访时间为 34 个月。在我们的研究组中,世界卫生组织(WHO)Ⅱ型是 NPC 的主要组织学类型(69.9%)。12 例患者出现局部区域失败,34 例患者发生远处转移,这是主要的失败模式。3 年局部无复发生存率(LRFS)、区域无复发生存率(RRFS)、远处无转移生存率(DMFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为 86.6%、86.7%、86.4%和 85.7%。多变量分析显示,N 分类、年龄(≤50 岁与>50 岁)和 WHO 类型(WHOⅡ型与 WHO Ⅲ型)是 DMFS、LRFS 和 OS 的独立预测因素。肿瘤体积(≤50cm3 与>50cm3)和贫血的存在是无进展生存(PFS)的独立显著预后因素。不同 T 分期之间无显著差异。急性和晚期毒性为轻度或中度。未观察到 4 级毒性。

结论

在我们的研究组中,WHO Ⅱ型是主要的组织学类型,也是一个显著的不良预后因素,表明非流行地区 NPC 的致癌途径与流行地区不同。我们在非流行地区使用调强放疗治疗 NPC 的经验显示出优异的局部区域控制和良好的毒性特征。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with predominantly WHO II histology treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in non-endemic region of China.中国非鼻咽癌高发地区以世卫组织 II 级为主的鼻咽癌患者接受调强放疗的临床转归。
Oral Oncol. 2012 Sep;48(9):864-9. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
2
Treatment outcomes and late toxicities of 869 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy: new insight into the value of total dose of cisplatin and radiation boost.869例鼻咽癌患者接受根治性调强放疗的治疗结果及晚期毒性反应:顺铂总剂量及放疗增敏价值的新见解
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 10;6(35):38381-97. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5420.
3
Long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 868 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of survival and treatment toxicities.868例鼻咽癌患者调强放疗的长期疗效:生存及治疗毒性分析
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Mar;110(3):398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
4
Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience.调强放射治疗鼻咽癌:香港的经验
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Dec 1;60(5):1440-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.022.
5
Clinical outcomes for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma with predominantly WHO II histology treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy in nonendemic region of China.在中国非流行地区,采用调强放射治疗联合或不联合化疗对主要为WHO II型组织学的早期鼻咽癌患者的临床结局。
Head Neck. 2014 Jun;36(6):841-7. doi: 10.1002/hed.23386. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
6
Pretreatment prognostic factors of survival and late toxicities for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy.同期加量调强放疗治疗鼻咽癌患者的生存和晚期毒性的预处理预后因素。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 20;13(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0990-5.
7
Effectiveness and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.调强放疗治疗 T4 期鼻咽癌的有效性和毒性。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 7;9(3):e91362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091362. eCollection 2014.
8
Long-term survival outcomes and adverse effects of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with IMRT in a non-endemic region: a population-based retrospective study.非鼻咽癌高发地区调强放疗鼻咽癌患者的长期生存结果和不良反应:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e045417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045417.
9
Clinical Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for T4 Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.T4期鼻咽癌调强放射治疗的临床疗效及预后因素
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4398498. doi: 10.1155/2016/4398498. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
10
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy achieves better local control compared to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for T4-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.对于T4期鼻咽癌,与三维适形放射治疗相比,调强放射治疗能实现更好的局部控制。
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 21;8(8):14068-14077. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12736.

引用本文的文献

1
Plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA for the prediction of treatment response and disease progression in non-keratinizing differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.血浆爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒DNA用于预测非角化性分化型鼻咽癌的治疗反应和疾病进展
Infect Agent Cancer. 2025 May 20;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13027-025-00661-3.
2
Gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A real-world study.吉西他滨和顺铂诱导化疗序贯同步放化疗治疗Ⅲ-ⅣA期鼻咽癌:一项真实世界研究
Sci Prog. 2025 Jan-Mar;108(1):368504241312582. doi: 10.1177/00368504241312582.
3
Survival rate prediction of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on MRI and gene expression using a deep neural network.
基于 MRI 和基因表达的深度神经网络预测鼻咽癌患者生存率。
Cancer Sci. 2023 Apr;114(4):1596-1605. doi: 10.1111/cas.15704. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
4
Current Radiotherapy Considerations for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.鼻咽癌当前的放射治疗考量
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;14(23):5773. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235773.
5
A dynamic nomogram combining tumor stage and magnetic resonance imaging features to predict the response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.一个结合肿瘤分期和磁共振成像特征的动态列线图模型,用于预测局部晚期鼻咽癌对诱导化疗的反应。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Mar;33(3):2171-2184. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09201-8. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
6
Prognostic models for early and late tumor progression prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An analysis of 8292 endemic cases.鼻咽癌早期和晚期肿瘤进展预测的预后模型:8292 例地方性病例分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):5384-5396. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5361. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Residual Volume of Lymph Nodes During Chemoradiotherapy Based Nomogram to Predict Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patient Receiving Induction Chemotherapy.基于放化疗的鼻咽癌诱导化疗患者生存预测列线图中淋巴结的残余体积
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 6;11:739103. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.739103. eCollection 2021.
8
Long-term survival outcomes and adverse effects of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with IMRT in a non-endemic region: a population-based retrospective study.非鼻咽癌高发地区调强放疗鼻咽癌患者的长期生存结果和不良反应:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e045417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045417.
9
Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Therapy versus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Patients with Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.调强质子束治疗与容积调强弧形放疗用于鼻咽癌患者的疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 16;13(14):3555. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143555.
10
Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus docetaxel and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma from non-endemic area of China.吉西他滨和顺铂与多西他赛和顺铂作为诱导化疗,随后在非中国鼻咽癌高发地区进行同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;146(9):2369-2378. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03229-3. Epub 2020 May 3.