Huk I, Entscheff P, Prager M, Schulz F, Polterauer P, Funovics J
1st Department of Surgery, University of Vienna, Austria.
Angiology. 1990 Nov;41(11):936-41. doi: 10.1177/000331979004101107.
Intraarterial implantable drug delivery systems have been considered as an alternative method for treating patients with unresectable liver malignancies. However, catheter problems with external implanted devices have resulted in limited application of chemotherapy. The introduction of subcutaneous devices offers an opportunity for long-term locoregional chemotherapy. Twelve external intraarterial catheters were implanted into 12 patients and 52 subcutaneously placed devices into 51 patients, all with various hepatic malignancies. Retrospective analyses comparing those two intraarterial systems were conducted taking into account the function and complication rate (hepatic artery thrombosis, infection, leaking, hemorrhage, and dislocation). The follow-up time for the external system was two to eight months (median five weeks), the thrombosis rate 33.3%, and the infection rate 25%. One instance of severe bleeding from the hepatic artery occurred during chemotherapy. One catheter dislocated. For the subcutaneously implanted intraarterial devices the follow-up time was five to forty-one months (median sixteen months), the thrombotic complication rate 17.3%, and the infection rate 7.6% (all patients with simultaneous bowel surgery). Catheter dislocation one year later required reimplantation; in 1 patient therapy had to be discontinued because of a catheter leak. The overall function rate was 71.3% with a median follow-up time of eight months. Anticoagulation therapy for subcutaneously implanted devices starting from the beginning of intraarterial chemotherapy is recommended to achieve long-term patency. No implantation should be preformed simultaneously with bowel surgery. The subcutaneously placed intraarterial devices had a higher function rate and were available for a longer period as compared with external implanted catheters.
动脉内植入式给药系统已被视为治疗不可切除肝恶性肿瘤患者的一种替代方法。然而,外部植入装置的导管问题导致化疗应用受限。皮下装置的引入为长期局部化疗提供了机会。12名患者植入了12根外部动脉内导管,51名患者皮下放置了52个装置,所有患者均患有各种肝脏恶性肿瘤。对这两种动脉内系统进行回顾性分析,同时考虑其功能和并发症发生率(肝动脉血栓形成、感染、渗漏、出血和移位)。外部系统的随访时间为2至8个月(中位时间为5周),血栓形成率为33.3%,感染率为25%。化疗期间发生1例肝动脉严重出血。1根导管发生移位。对于皮下植入的动脉内装置,随访时间为5至41个月(中位时间为16个月),血栓并发症发生率为17.3%,感染率为7.6%(所有患者均同时接受肠道手术)。1年后导管移位需要重新植入;1例患者因导管渗漏不得不停止治疗。总体功能率为71.3%,中位随访时间为8个月。建议从动脉内化疗开始就对皮下植入装置进行抗凝治疗,以实现长期通畅。不应与肠道手术同时进行植入。与外部植入导管相比,皮下放置的动脉内装置功能率更高,使用时间更长。