Suppr超能文献

在下肢经皮腔内血管成形术中,腔内治疗优于内膜下治疗。

In lower extremity PTAs intraluminal is better than subintimal.

作者信息

Bosiers M, Deloose K, Callaert J, Maene L, Keirse K, Verbist J, Peeters P

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, AZ Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde, Belgium.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2012 Apr;53(2):223-7.

Abstract

With subintimal recanalization, a channel is deliberately created by dissecting the vessel wall in order to replace the native occluded lumen. This is opposed to intraluminal recanalization, where passage of an arterial obstructive lesion is performed by central luminal navigation. Both intraluminal and subintimal treatment has its proponents and adversaries. The appreciation of an investigator for a certain technique is commonly related to the training received and the personal experience. Yet, the intraluminal technique uses the clinically preferred route for adjunctive treatment, such as balloon angioplasty or stent deployment. A wide variety of devices designed to obtain intraluminal lesion passage is available and is currently being used in vascular centers worldwide. With intraluminal techniques, success rates of up to 95% have been reported.

摘要

采用内膜下再通术时,需通过剥离血管壁有意制造一个通道,以替代原本闭塞的管腔。这与腔内再通术相反,腔内再通术是通过管腔中央导航来打通动脉阻塞性病变。腔内和内膜下治疗都有其支持者和反对者。研究者对某种技术的偏好通常与所接受的培训和个人经验有关。然而,腔内技术采用的是临床辅助治疗的首选路径,如球囊血管成形术或支架置入术。目前有各种各样旨在打通腔内病变的器械可供使用,并且正在全球血管中心使用。采用腔内技术时,据报道成功率高达95%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验