Section of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 May;95(5):1113-35. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.030254. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
The rate of exclusive breastfeeding remains low in many countries. Furthermore, cesarean delivery (CD) is increasing and may affect breastfeeding success.
The objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to determine whether CD (prelabor or in-labor) is associated with a lower rate of breastfeeding compared with vaginal delivery (VD).
Studies published before January 2011 that reported breastfeeding up to 6 mo postpartum and compared outcomes after CD or VD, including foreign language publications, were identified through PubMed and bibliographic review. Prespecified data were extracted independently by multiple observers. The types of CD [prelabor (elective/scheduled) or in-labor (emergency)] were compared by subgroup analyses. Potential sources of study-level bias were analyzed by using meta-regression and sensitivity analyses.
The systematic review included 53 studies (554,568 subjects, 33 countries); 25 authors contributed additional data (245,455 subjects), and 48 studies (553,306 subjects, 31 countries) were included in the meta-analysis. Rates of early breastfeeding (any initiation or at hospital discharge) were lower after CD compared with after VD (pooled OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.64; P < 0.00001) and lower after prelabor but not after in-labor CD (prelabor OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.80, 0.86; P < 0.00001; in-labor OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.04; P = 0.86). In mothers who initiated breastfeeding, CD had no significant effect on any breastfeeding at 6 mo (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.01; P = 0.08).
There was a negative association between prelabor CD and early breastfeeding. If breastfeeding is initiated, mode of delivery has no apparent effect on the number of mothers still breastfeeding at 6 mo. Women and health care workers should be aware of the negative associations between CD and early breastfeeding and consequent implications for infants' well-being.
在许多国家,纯母乳喂养率仍然很低。此外,剖宫产(CD)的比例不断增加,这可能会影响母乳喂养的成功率。
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定计划性剖宫产(prelabor CD)和紧急剖宫产(in-labor CD)是否较阴道分娩(VD)更不利于母乳喂养。
通过 PubMed 和文献回顾,检索 2011 年 1 月之前发表的比较 CD 或 VD 后母乳喂养至产后 6 个月的研究,包括外文文献。由多名观察者独立提取预设数据。通过亚组分析比较计划性剖宫产的类型(计划性剖宫产[择期/预定]或紧急剖宫产)。采用荟萃回归和敏感性分析分析研究水平偏倚的潜在来源。
系统综述纳入 53 项研究(554568 例患者,来自 33 个国家);25 位作者提供了额外的数据(245455 例患者),48 项研究(553306 例患者,来自 31 个国家)被纳入荟萃分析。与 VD 相比,CD 后早期母乳喂养(任何起始时间或出院时)的比例较低(混合比值比[OR]:0.57;95%置信区间[CI]:0.50,0.64;P < 0.00001),且计划性 CD 后较低,而紧急 CD 后则无显著差异(计划性 CD 前 OR:0.83;95% CI:0.80,0.86;P < 0.00001;紧急 CD 前 OR:1.00;95% CI:0.97,1.04;P = 0.86)。在开始母乳喂养的产妇中,CD 对 6 个月时任何母乳喂养均无显著影响(OR:0.95;95% CI:0.89,1.01;P = 0.08)。
计划性 CD 与早期母乳喂养呈负相关。如果开始母乳喂养,则分娩方式对 6 个月时仍母乳喂养的母亲数量没有明显影响。妇女和卫生保健工作者应认识到 CD 与早期母乳喂养之间的负面关联及其对婴儿健康的影响。