Suppr超能文献

经颅彩色多普勒超声在有无造影剂增强情况下对颅内动脉瘤的检测及特征分析比较

Comparison of transcranial color Doppler sonography without and with contrast enhancement for detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms.

作者信息

Wang Li-Shu, He Wen, Zhang Hui-Qin, Wang Shuo, Zhao Yuan-Li, Tian Feng-Lan, Xiang Dong-Ying

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Clin Ultrasound. 2012 Nov-Dec;40(9):535-9. doi: 10.1002/jcu.21911. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic value of transcranial color Doppler sonography (TCCS) with contrast-enhanced transcranial color Doppler sonography (CE-TCCS) for the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

Thirty patients highly suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm were imaged using TCCS and CE-TCCS. The ability to detect the aneurysms and determine their size and location accurately was compared with findings from digital subtraction angiography.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity of CE-TCCS was greater than that of TCCS (24/30 versus 20/30, respectively) (p = 0.125), but the difference was not significant. Neither TCCS nor CE-TCCS could detect the three small (≤5 mm diameter) aneurysms. The detection rate for larger aneurysms (5-15 mm diameter, n = 17) was nonsignificantly greater with CE-TCCS (14/17) than with TCCS (11/17) (p = 0.438). Similarly, CE-TCCS detected more large or giant aneurysms (>16 mm diameter) than TCCS (10/10 versus 9/10, respectively) but the difference was not significant (p = 1.000). The benefit of contrast enhancement was identical for aneurysms ≥10 mm or <10 mm in diameter. All (7/7) middle cerebral artery aneurysms were detected by both TCCS and CE-TCCS. CE-TCCS yielded similar or slightly better results than TCCS for all other aneurysm locations.

CONCLUSION

CE-TCCS can improve the sensitivity and detection rate of intracranial aneurysms ≥5 mm in size.

摘要

目的

比较经颅彩色多普勒超声(TCCS)与对比增强经颅彩色多普勒超声(CE-TCCS)在颅内动脉瘤检测及特征描述方面的诊断价值。

方法

对30例高度怀疑患有颅内动脉瘤的患者进行TCCS和CE-TCCS检查。将检测动脉瘤及准确确定其大小和位置的能力与数字减影血管造影的结果进行比较。

结果

CE-TCCS的总体敏感性高于TCCS(分别为24/30和20/30)(p = 0.125),但差异无统计学意义。TCCS和CE-TCCS均未检测出3个小(直径≤5 mm)动脉瘤。对于较大动脉瘤(直径5 - 15 mm,n = 17),CE-TCCS的检测率(14/17)略高于TCCS(11/17),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.438)。同样,CE-TCCS检测出的大或巨大动脉瘤(直径>16 mm)比TCCS多(分别为10/10和9/10),但差异无统计学意义(p = 1.000)。直径≥10 mm或<10 mm的动脉瘤,对比增强的益处相同。所有(7/7)大脑中动脉动脉瘤均被TCCS和CE-TCCS检测出。对于所有其他动脉瘤位置,CE-TCCS的结果与TCCS相似或略好。

结论

CE-TCCS可提高直径≥5 mm的颅内动脉瘤的敏感性和检测率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验