Desai Shrikar R, Karthikeyan I, Singh Rika
Department of Periodontology & Implantology, H.K.E. Society's S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, PIN 585 105, India.
ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:680587. doi: 10.5402/2012/680587. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
Purpose. The purpose of this finite element study was to compare stresses, strains, and displacements of double versus single implant, in immediate loading for replacing mandibular molar. Materials and Methods. Two 3D FEM models were made to simulate implant designs. The first model used 6 mm wide-diameter implant to support a single molar crown. The second model used 3.75-3.75 double implant design. Each model was analyzed with a single force magnitude of 70 N in oblique axis in three locations. Results. This FEM study suggested that micromotion can be well controlled by both double implants and 6 mm single wide-diameter implant. The Von Mises stress for double implant had 31%-43% stress reduction compared to the 6 mm implant. Conclusion. Within the limitations of the paper, when the mesiodistal space for artificial tooth is more than 12.5 mm, under immediate loading, the double implant support should be considered.
目的。本有限元研究的目的是比较在下颌磨牙即刻种植中,双种植体与单种植体的应力、应变和位移情况。材料与方法。制作了两个三维有限元模型来模拟种植体设计。第一个模型使用6毫米宽直径种植体来支持单个磨牙冠。第二个模型采用3.75 - 3.75双种植体设计。每个模型在三个位置沿斜轴方向施加70牛的单一力大小进行分析。结果。本有限元研究表明,双种植体和6毫米单宽直径种植体都能很好地控制微动。与6毫米种植体相比,双种植体的冯·米塞斯应力降低了31% - 43%。结论。在本文的局限性范围内,当人工牙的近远中空间大于12.5毫米时,在即刻加载情况下,应考虑双种植体支持。