Sumra Nida, Desai Shrikar, Kulshrestha Rohit, Mishra Khusbhu, Singh Raahat Vikram, Gaonkar Prachi
Consulting Periodontist, BDS MDS, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India.
Department of Periodontics, HKESN Dental College and Hospital, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 Jul-Aug;25(4):288-294. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_350_20. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
Success of an implant depends on its placement in the bone and how well the stress and strain are distributed to the surrounding structures when occlusal force is applied to it. The size and shape of the implant plays an important role is the formation and distribution of stress and strains in the periodontium. Von Mises stresses and micromovements need to be evaluated while placing implants in D4 bone quality regions for a higher success rate.
To evaluate the peri-implant Von Mises stresses, strains, and micromovements distribution in D4 bone quality around ultra-short implants of 5 mm length with varying diameters of 4 mm, 5 mm, and 6 mm.
The finite element method was employed to make models replacing maxillary molars in D4 type bone that was missing. Implants that could be classified as ultrashort (5 mm) were used. These implants were of varying diameters of 4, 5, and 6 mm. In each model, the implant was subjected to a force of 100 N and analyzed. The force was applied in an oblique (45 degrees) and vertical direction (90°) to the long axis of the tooth. The models were made such that they simulated cortical and cancellous anisotropic properties of the bone. The models were then analyzed using the program ANSYS workbench version 12.1.
When all the three diameters were compared wide diameter, i.e., 6 mm threads had the least values of peri-implant von Mises stresses, strains, and micro-movements around them. When thread shapes were taken into consideration square micro thread created the most favorable stress parameters around them with minimum values of stress, strains, and micromovements.
Ultrashort implants combined with a wide diameter and platform switched can be used in atrophic ridges or when there is a need for extensive surgery to prepare the implant site.
种植体的成功取决于其在骨内的植入位置,以及在施加咬合力时应力和应变向周围结构的分布情况。种植体的尺寸和形状在牙周组织应力和应变的形成与分布中起着重要作用。在D4级骨质量区域植入种植体时,需要评估冯·米塞斯应力和微位移,以提高成功率。
评估长度为5mm、直径分别为4mm、5mm和6mm的超短种植体周围D4级骨质量区域的种植体周围冯·米塞斯应力、应变和微位移分布情况。
采用有限元方法制作上颌磨牙缺失的D4型骨替代模型。使用可归类为超短(5mm)的种植体,其直径分别为4mm、5mm和6mm。在每个模型中,对种植体施加100N的力并进行分析。力以与牙长轴呈45度的斜向和90度的垂直方向施加。制作模型时模拟了骨皮质和松质骨的各向异性特性。然后使用ANSYS workbench 12.1版本程序对模型进行分析。
当比较所有三种直径时,宽直径即6mm螺纹周围的种植体周围冯·米塞斯应力、应变和微位移值最小。当考虑螺纹形状时,方形微螺纹周围产生的应力参数最有利,应力、应变和微位移值最小。
超短种植体结合宽直径和平台转换可用于萎缩性牙槽嵴或需要进行广泛手术来准备种植部位的情况。