Suppr超能文献

荷兰影响智障患者医生临终决策的因素:一项定性研究。

The factors affecting end-of-life decision-making by physicians of patients with intellectual disabilities in the Netherlands: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Koraalgroep, Maasveld, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Apr;57(4):380-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01550.x. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the process of end-of-life decision-making regarding people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in the Netherlands, from the perspective of physicians.

METHODS

This qualitative study involved nine semi-structured interviews with ID physicians in the Netherlands after the deaths of patients with ID that involved end-of-life decisions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Grounded Theory procedures.

RESULTS

Four main contributory factors to the physicians decision-making process were identified, three of which are related to the importance of relatives' wishes and opinions: (1) Involving relatives in decision-making. As they had assessed their patients as lacking capacity, the physicians gave very great weight to the opinions and wishes of the relatives and tended to follow these wishes. (2) Delegating quality of life assessments to relatives. Physicians justified their end-of-life decisions based on their medical assessment, but left the assessment of the patients' quality of life to relatives, despite having their own implicit opinion about quality of life. (3) Good working relationships. Physicians sought consensus with relatives and paid care staff, often giving greater weight to the importance of good working relationships than to their own assessment of the patient's best interest. (4) Knowledge of the patient's vulnerabilities. Physicians used their intimate, long-standing knowledge of the patient's fragile health.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to take a more balanced decision, physicians should seek possibilities to involve patients with ID themselves and other stakeholders which are important for the patients. Physicians who have known the patient over time should rely more on their own knowledge of the patient's needs and preferences, seek the input of others, and openly take the lead in the decision-making process.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在从医生的角度探讨荷兰智障人士(ID)临终决策的过程。

方法

本定性研究对荷兰 9 名 ID 医生进行了 9 次半结构化访谈,访谈对象为涉及临终决策的 ID 患者死亡后。采访记录逐字转录,并使用扎根理论程序进行分析。

结果

确定了医生决策过程的四个主要促成因素,其中三个与亲属的意愿和意见有关:(1)让亲属参与决策。由于他们认为这些患者缺乏能力,医生非常重视亲属的意见和愿望,并倾向于听从这些愿望。(2)将生活质量评估委托给亲属。医生根据自己的医疗评估做出临终决策,但将患者的生活质量评估留给亲属,尽管他们对生活质量有自己的看法。(3)良好的工作关系。医生寻求与亲属和护理人员达成共识,往往更重视良好工作关系的重要性,而不是自己对患者最佳利益的评估。(4)了解患者的脆弱性。医生利用他们对患者脆弱健康的长期深入了解。

结论

为了做出更平衡的决策,医生应该寻找让 ID 患者自己和对患者重要的其他利益相关者参与的可能性。随着时间的推移了解患者的医生应该更多地依赖自己对患者需求和偏好的了解,寻求他人的意见,并在决策过程中公开带头。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验