• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测和校正群体分层的方法。

Methods for detecting and correcting for population stratification.

作者信息

Edwards Todd L, Gao Xiaoyi

机构信息

Center for Human Genetics Research, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2012 Apr;Chapter 1:Unit 1.22.1-14. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0122s73.

DOI:10.1002/0471142905.hg0122s73
PMID:22470140
Abstract

Population stratification (PS) is a primary consideration in studies of the genetic determinants of human traits. Failure to control for it may lead to confounding, causing a study to fail for lack of significant results or resources to be wasted following false-positive signals. Here we review historical and current approaches for addressing PS when performing genetic association studies in human populations. We describe methods for detecting the presence of PS including global and local ancestry methods. We also describe approaches for accounting for PS when calculating association statistics, such that measures of association are not confounded. This is particularly important since many traits are being examined in minority populations, populations that may inherently feature PS.

摘要

群体分层(PS)是人类性状遗传决定因素研究中的首要考虑因素。未能对其进行控制可能会导致混杂,致使研究因缺乏显著结果而失败,或者在出现假阳性信号后造成资源浪费。在此,我们回顾了在人类群体中进行基因关联研究时处理群体分层的历史和当前方法。我们描述了检测群体分层存在的方法,包括全局和局部祖先方法。我们还描述了在计算关联统计量时考虑群体分层的方法,以使关联度量不被混淆。这一点尤为重要,因为许多性状正在少数群体中进行研究,而这些群体可能本身就存在群体分层特征。

相似文献

1
Methods for detecting and correcting for population stratification.检测和校正群体分层的方法。
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2012 Apr;Chapter 1:Unit 1.22.1-14. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0122s73.
2
Population Stratification in Genetic Association Studies.基因关联研究中的群体分层
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2017 Oct 18;95:1.22.1-1.22.23. doi: 10.1002/cphg.48.
3
Novel probabilistic models of spatial genetic ancestry with applications to stratification correction in genome-wide association studies.用于全基因组关联研究分层校正的空间遗传血统新型概率模型。
Bioinformatics. 2017 Mar 15;33(6):879-885. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw720.
4
Assessing the impact of population stratification on association studies of rare variation.评估群体分层对罕见变异关联研究的影响。
Hum Hered. 2013;76(1):28-35. doi: 10.1159/000353270. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
5
A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.混合模型可减少全基因组关联研究中群体分层产生的虚假遗传关联。
Genomics. 2015 Apr;105(4):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
6
Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies.用于全基因组关联研究中样本结构的方差成分模型。
Nat Genet. 2010 Apr;42(4):348-54. doi: 10.1038/ng.548. Epub 2010 Mar 7.
7
Genetic background comparison using distance-based regression, with applications in population stratification evaluation and adjustment.使用基于距离的回归进行遗传背景比较及其在群体分层评估与调整中的应用。
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;33(5):432-41. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20396.
8
A powerful approach to test an optimally weighted combination of rare variants in admixed populations.一种用于测试混合人群中稀有变异最优加权组合的有效方法。
Genet Epidemiol. 2015 May;39(4):294-305. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21894. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
9
Testing for genetic association in the presence of population stratification in genome-wide association studies.在全基因组关联研究中存在群体分层时的遗传关联测试。
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;33(7):637-45. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20415.
10
[Analysis of population stratification using random SNPs in genome-wide association studies].[在全基因组关联研究中使用随机单核苷酸多态性进行群体分层分析]
Yi Chuan. 2010 Sep;32(9):921-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Deciphering the Genetic Complexity of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Insights and Effective Strategies.解读经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤的遗传复杂性:见解与有效策略
Curr Genomics. 2024;25(5):334-342. doi: 10.2174/0113892029301904240513045755. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
Quality Control for the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip.Illumina人类外显子芯片的质量控制
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2016 Jul 1;90:2.14.1-2.14.16. doi: 10.1002/cphg.15.
3
Power considerations for λ inflation factor in meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies.全基因组关联研究荟萃分析中λ膨胀因子的效能考量
Genet Res (Camb). 2016 May 19;98:e9. doi: 10.1017/S0016672316000069.
4
Statistical methods for genome-wide and sequencing association studies of complex traits in related samples.相关样本中复杂性状的全基因组和测序关联研究的统计方法。
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2015 Jan 20;84:1.28.1-1.28.9. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0128s84.
5
Native American ancestry is associated with severe diabetic retinopathy in Latinos.美洲原住民血统与拉丁裔人群的严重糖尿病视网膜病变有关。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Aug 21;55(9):6041-5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15044.
6
Pathway-based approaches for sequencing-based genome-wide association studies.基于通路的测序全基因组关联研究方法。
Genet Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;37(5):478-94. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21728. Epub 2013 May 5.
7
Phenotyping clinical disorders: lessons learned from pelvic organ prolapse.表型临床疾病:从盆腔器官脱垂中得到的经验教训。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;208(5):360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.030. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
8
Genome-wide association study heterogeneous cohort homogenization via subject weight knock-down.通过受试者体重降低实现全基因组关联研究异质队列同质化
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048653. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
9
The success of pharmacogenomics in moving genetic association studies from bench to bedside: study design and implementation of precision medicine in the post-GWAS era.从实验室到临床:遗传关联研究在药物基因组学中的成功——后 GWAS 时代精准医学的研究设计与实施。
Hum Genet. 2012 Oct;131(10):1615-26. doi: 10.1007/s00439-012-1221-z. Epub 2012 Aug 25.