USDA ARS Exotic and Invasive Weeds Research Unit, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, California 94710, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2012 Jan;22(1):20-34. doi: 10.1890/10-2120.1.
Biological control (the importation of enemies from an invader's native range) is often considered our best chance of controlling the most widespread invaders. Ideally, the agent reduces invader abundance to some acceptably low level, and the two coexist at low density with the agent providing continuous control over the long-term. But the outcome may be complicated when the agent is attacked by native predators and parasites. We used a spatially explicit, discrete-time, individual-based, coupled plant-seed predator-parasitoid model to estimate the impact of the biocontrol agent Eustenopus villosus (a seed predator) on the invasive, annual weed Centaurea solstitialis, both with and without the generalist parasitoid Pyemotes tritici. We estimated the agent's ability to reduce plant density, spread rate, and population growth rate over 50 years. We used long-term demographic data from two sites in central California, USA, to parameterize the model and assess how populations in different climatic zones might respond differently to the agent and the parasitoid. We found that the biocontrol agent reduced plant density (relative to predictions for an uncontrolled invasion), but its impact on the invader's spread rate was modest and inconsistent. The agent had no long-term impact on population growth rate (lambda). Parasitism caused a trophic cascade, the strength of which varied between sites. At our coastal site, the parasitoid entirely eliminated the impact of the agent on the plant. At our Central Valley site, even when parasitized, the agent significantly reduced plant density and spread rate over several decades (although to a lesser degree than when it was not parasitized), but not invader lambda. Surprisingly, we also found that the length of time the invader was allowed to spread across the landscape prior to introducing the agent (5, 25, or 50 years) had little influence over its ability to control the weed in the long-term. This is encouraging news for land managers attempting to control invasive plants that have already established widespread, high-density populations. Unfortunately, our results also show that attack by the native generalist parasitoid had a larger influence over how effectively the agent reduced invader performance.
生物防治(从入侵物种的原生范围引入天敌)通常被认为是控制最广泛入侵物种的最佳途径。理想情况下,该生物防治剂将入侵物种的数量减少到可接受的低水平,并且两者在低密度下共存,生物防治剂在长期内提供持续控制。但是,当天敌受到本地捕食者和寄生虫攻击时,结果可能会很复杂。我们使用了一个空间显式、离散时间、基于个体的、耦合的植物-种子捕食者-寄生蜂模型,来估计生物防治剂 Eustenopus villosus(一种种子捕食者)对入侵性一年生杂草 Centaurea solstitialis 的影响,同时考虑了是否存在一般性寄生蜂 Pyemotes tritici。我们估计了该生物防治剂在 50 年内降低植物密度、传播速度和种群增长率的能力。我们使用了来自美国加利福尼亚州中部两个地点的长期人口统计数据来参数化模型,并评估了不同气候带的种群可能如何对生物防治剂和寄生蜂产生不同的反应。我们发现,生物防治剂降低了植物密度(相对于不受控制的入侵预测值),但其对入侵物种传播速度的影响是适度的且不一致。该生物防治剂对种群增长率(lambda)没有长期影响。寄生作用导致了营养级联,其强度在不同地点之间有所不同。在我们的沿海地点,寄生蜂完全消除了生物防治剂对植物的影响。在我们的中央山谷地点,即使被寄生,生物防治剂在几十年内仍显著降低了植物密度和传播速度(尽管程度低于未被寄生时),但对入侵物种的 lambda 没有影响。令人惊讶的是,我们还发现,在引入生物防治剂之前,让入侵物种在景观中传播的时间长短(5、25 或 50 年)对其在长期内控制杂草的能力几乎没有影响。这对于试图控制已经建立了广泛高密度种群的入侵植物的土地管理者来说是个好消息。不幸的是,我们的结果还表明,本地一般性寄生蜂的攻击对生物防治剂降低入侵物种表现的有效性有更大的影响。