Xu Xing-Hua, Fang Xiao-Li
Department of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Massage, Gansu College of TCM, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2012 Mar;32(3):233-6.
To observe the differences in the efficacy on xerophthalmia treated with the needling technique for warming-promotion at Fengchi (GB 20) as the main acupoint in comparison with the conventional needling technique.
Thirty cases were randomly divided into a warming-promotion needling group (n = 15) and a routine needling group (n = 15). In warming-promotion needling group, the needling technique for warming-promotion was applied to Fengchi (GB 20). Additionally, the local and distal acupoints [such as the point beneath Cuanzu (BL 2), Neiguan (PC 6), Guangming (GB 37), Taichong (LR 3), Fulio (KI 7) and Sanyinjiao (SP 6)], as well as the scalp acupuncture (bilateral supraoccipital lateral line and supraoccipital midline) were selected and stimulated with even-needling technique by rotating the needle. In routine needling group, the acupoints were same as warming-promotion needling group and were stimulated with even-needling technique by rotating the needle. After 2 sessions of treatment, the efficacy, tear secretion volume and the total score of symptoms were compared between two groups.
The total effective rate was 86.7% (13/15) in warming-promotion needling group, which was superior to 66.7% (10/15) in routine needling group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the tear secretion volume and the total score of symptoms were all apparently improved in two groups (all P < 0.05), in which, the improvement in warming-promotion needling group was much obvious (all P < 0.05).
The therapeutic effect of warming-promotion needling technique is apparently superior to that of conventional one.
观察以风池(GB 20)为主穴采用温通针法治疗干眼症的疗效与传统针法的差异。
将30例患者随机分为温通针法组(n = 15)和常规针法组(n = 15)。温通针法组采用温通针法针刺风池(GB 20),并选取局部及远端穴位[如攒竹下(BL 2)、内关(PC 6)、光明(GB 37)、太冲(LR 3)、复溜(KI 7)、三阴交(SP 6)],以及头皮针(双侧枕上旁线和枕上正中线),运用捻转补泻手法进行针刺。常规针法组所选穴位与温通针法组相同,采用捻转补泻手法进行针刺。两组均治疗2个疗程后,比较疗效、泪液分泌量及症状总分。
温通针法组总有效率为86.7%(13/15),优于常规针法组的66.7%(10/15)(P < 0.05)。治疗后,两组泪液分泌量及症状总分均明显改善(均P < 0.05),其中温通针法组改善更为明显(均P < 0.05)。
温通针法的治疗效果明显优于传统针法。