Wertz Debra, Hou Likun, DeVries Andrea, Dupclay Leon, McGowan Frannie, Malinowski Barry, Cziraky Mark J
HealthCore, Wilmington, DE 19801, USA.
Manag Care. 2012 Mar;21(3):44-54.
Value-based insurance designs (VBID) have been developed by health insurance companies and used by employers to allocate health care resources appropriately and to lower patients' out-of-pocket costs for services related to chronic conditions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Cincinnati Pharmacy Coaching Program (CPCP) on clinical and economic outcomes. The CPCP is a VBID implemented by Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield in Ohio. It provided tailored pharmacist-based educational services and financial incentives to participants.
This was a quasi-experimental pre/post longitudinal study in which patients were identified as they enrolled in the CPCP between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2009. Patients could participate in a Diabetes Coaching Program (DCP) or a Heart Healthy Coaching Program (HHCP). Control subjects were selected from patients who were invited but did not choose to participate. Control subjects were matched to intervention cohorts using propensity score matching. Clinical (blood pressure, lipid levels, and hemoglobin A1c) and economic (all-cause and disease-attributable) outcomes were evaluated using within-subject (pre-post) and between-subject comparison (intervention-control) design.
A total of 607 patients were enrolled in intervention groups, and 557 control subjects were selected after matching. Significant reductions were found in blood pressure, lipid levels, and hemoglobin A1c after enrollment, and a significantly greater proportion of patients, compared with controls, achieved their clinical goals according to national guidelines in both programs. Hypertension-related cost trends were favorable for HHCP relative to the control cohort. Diabetes-related costs increased for all groups from pre- to post-index, largely driven by office visits and medication costs in the DCP and inpatient/ER visits in the control cohort.
Results showed significant improvements in all diabetes- and hypertension-related clinical measures. This study shows the effect of a comprehensive VBID on the health of patients with chronic disease.
基于价值的保险设计(VBID)由健康保险公司开发,并被雇主采用,以适当分配医疗资源并降低患者与慢性病相关服务的自付费用。本研究的目的是评估辛辛那提药房辅导计划(CPCP)对临床和经济结果的影响。CPCP是由俄亥俄州的Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield实施的一项VBID。它为参与者提供了量身定制的基于药剂师的教育服务和经济激励措施。
这是一项准实验性前后纵向研究,在2008年1月1日至2009年12月31日期间,患者在注册参加CPCP时被识别。患者可以参加糖尿病辅导计划(DCP)或心脏健康辅导计划(HHCP)。对照对象从被邀请但未选择参加的患者中选取。使用倾向得分匹配将对照对象与干预队列进行匹配。使用受试者内(前后)和受试者间比较(干预-对照)设计评估临床(血压、血脂水平和糖化血红蛋白A1c)和经济(全因和疾病归因)结果。
共有607名患者被纳入干预组,匹配后选取了557名对照对象。入组后血压、血脂水平和糖化血红蛋白A1c均有显著降低,与对照组相比,两个项目中达到国家指南临床目标的患者比例均显著更高。相对于对照队列,HHCP的高血压相关成本趋势有利。所有组的糖尿病相关成本从索引前到索引后均有所增加,主要由DCP中的门诊就诊和药物成本以及对照队列中的住院/急诊就诊推动。
结果显示所有糖尿病和高血压相关临床指标均有显著改善。本研究显示了全面的VBID对慢性病患者健康的影响。