Sharma Rajeev, Madan Nidhi, Venkatesh S, Ichhpujani R L, Lal S
WHO, NCDC.
J Commun Dis. 2010 Sep;42(3):185-90.
A multicentric quasi-experimental study was conducted in Delhi, from March 2007 to September 2007, on i) the factors which stimulate the donors to donate blood, ii) major barriers and myths associated with blood donation and iii) clinicians perception of the rational use of blood. The study design included a face-to-face survey, with a pre-tested questionnaire paper in two leading blood banks of Delhi and by relevant interviewers from the community and medical fraternity. The sample size was 240-blood donors from two different blood banks and the control group included 100 potential donors from community and 50 clinicians from various hospitals. The data generated was analyzed using excel sheet and Epi-Info software. The study revealed the factors which influence the blood donation included replacement credit and family/peer pressure. Regarding myths and barriers, among potential donors, about a quarter of them felt that it is time consuming, and 20% felt it could lead to sexual impairment or is not rewarding. A total of 10% were not aware about the blood donation while 15% said that donation time was inconvenient. Of the 50 clinicians, a quarter of them were not aware of the rational use of blood.
2007年3月至2007年9月，在德里进行了一项多中心准实验研究，内容包括：i）刺激献血者献血的因素；ii）与献血相关的主要障碍和误解；iii）临床医生对合理用血的看法。研究设计包括在德里的两家主要血库进行面对面调查，使用预先测试过的问卷，由社区和医学界的相关访谈者进行调查。样本量包括来自两家不同血库的240名献血者，对照组包括100名社区潜在献血者和来自各医院的50名临床医生。使用电子表格和Epi-Info软件对生成的数据进行分析。研究表明，影响献血的因素包括替代积分以及家庭/同伴压力。关于误解和障碍，在潜在献血者中，约四分之一的人认为献血耗时，20%的人认为献血可能导致性功能障碍或没有回报。共有10%的人不了解献血，15%的人表示献血时间不方便。在50名临床医生中，四分之一的人不了解合理用血。
