Department of Otolaryngology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jun;33(4):494-503. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824b76f1.
Audiological and subjective benefits in adult bone-anchored hearing device users.
Retrospective evaluation.
Tertiary referral center.
Thirty-eight adult subjects fitted with unilateral bone-anchored hearing device.
Audiometric measurements included sound-field pure-tone and speech audiometries (speech reception threshold, maximum speech discrimination). Subjective benefit was assessed by the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire. Ipsilateral and contralateral hearing loss was considered. Comparison was drawn between Compact, Divino, and Intenso processors.
To compare sound-field pure-tone and speech audiometries and APHAB results with and without the device adjusted for the unaided results.
With the device, sound-field pure-tone audiometry results revealed an increase gain in all frequencies. Sound-field speech audiometry showed that the mean threshold of speech recognition was 20 dB lower, maximum discrimination was attained at 5 dB less, and percentage of maximum discrimination increased by 5%. Scores in the APHAB questionnaire decreased except for the aversiveness subscale. Auditory-adjusted gain showed greater benefit in subjects with ipsilateral conductive hearing loss.Subjects with contralateral normal hearing or conductive hearing loss showed greater improvement that those with contralateral mixed or sensorineural hearing loss. There were no differences between Compact, Divino and Intenso processors.
When comparisons are adjusted for unaided condition, the bone-anchored hearing device provided auditory and subjective benefit in subjects with ipsilateral conductive hearing loss and contralateral normal hearing or conductive hearing loss. It gave marginal benefit in ipsilateral mixed and contralateral mixed or sensorineural hearing loss. No differences were found between the Compact, Intenso, and Divino processors.
成人骨导式助听设备使用者的听力学和主观获益。
回顾性评估。
三级转诊中心。
38 名单侧骨导式助听设备使用者的成年患者。
听力测量包括声场纯音和言语测听(言语接受阈,最大言语辨别率)。使用简短听力助听效果问卷(APHAB)评估主观获益。考虑到同侧和对侧听力损失。比较 Compact、Divino 和 Intenso 处理器。
比较声场纯音和言语测听以及 APHAB 结果,将设备调整为未佩戴设备时的结果。
使用设备后,声场纯音测听结果显示所有频率的增益均增加。声场言语测听表明,言语识别的平均阈值降低了 20dB,最大辨别率降低了 5dB,最大辨别率百分比提高了 5%。APHAB 问卷评分除了厌恶度分量表外均降低。听觉调整增益在同侧传导性听力损失的患者中获益更大。对侧正常听力或传导性听力损失的患者比对侧混合性或感音神经性听力损失的患者改善更大。Compact、Divino 和 Intenso 处理器之间没有差异。
当与未佩戴设备时的条件进行比较时,骨导式助听设备为同侧传导性听力损失和对侧正常听力或传导性听力损失的患者提供了听觉和主观获益。在同侧混合性和对侧混合性或感音神经性听力损失中提供了边缘获益。在 Compact、Intenso 和 Divino 处理器之间未发现差异。