• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用德尔菲法对纤维肌痛症结局评估的关键临床领域进行初步识别:意大利的经验

Preliminary identification of key clinical domains for outcome evaluation in fibromyalgia using the Delphi method: the Italian experience.

作者信息

Salaffi F, Ciapetti A, Sarzi Puttini P, Atzeni F, Iannuccelli C, Di Franco M, Cazzola M, Bazzichi L

机构信息

Università Politecnica delle Marche.

出版信息

Reumatismo. 2012 Mar 19;64(1):27-34. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2012.27.

DOI:10.4081/reumatismo.2012.27
PMID:22472780
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a complex syndrome that, in Italy, affects at least 2% of the adult population. It is characterized by chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain often accompanied by multiple other symptoms. The aim of this study was to identify a set of clinical domains for FM considered relevant by both clinicians and patients using a consensus process.

METHODS

Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method based on questionnaires and systematic, controlled opinion feedback. The Delphi exercise involved a panel of 252 rheumatologists and 86 patients with FM as defined by the American College of Rheumatology criteria. All of the patients and clinicians were asked to rank the relative different domains of FM in order of priority. The content validity index (CVI) was used to establish the percentage agreement. The importance of each item was ranked on a 0-3 Likert scale. The frequency, mean relevance scores, and frequency importance product were also calculated.

RESULTS

The Delphi exercise showed that the domains ranked highest by patients were similar to those of the clinicians, with the exception of tender point intensity (considered relevant by the clinicians but not by the patients) and environmental sensitivity (considered important by the patients but not by the clinicians). A final 8-item model was developed which was considered to demonstrate adequate validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The Delphi exercises identified and ranked relevant key clinical domains that need to be assessed in FM research. On the basis of these results, a new patient-reported composite outcome index can be developed and used in clinical trials.

摘要

目的

纤维肌痛(FM)是一种复杂的综合征,在意大利,至少2%的成年人口受其影响。其特征为慢性广泛性肌肉骨骼疼痛,常伴有多种其他症状。本研究的目的是通过共识过程确定一组临床医生和患者均认为与FM相关的临床领域。

方法

基于问卷及系统、可控的意见反馈,采用德尔菲法达成共识。德尔菲调查涉及一个由252名风湿病学家和86名符合美国风湿病学会标准定义的FM患者组成的小组。所有患者和临床医生均被要求按优先顺序对FM的不同相关领域进行排序。内容效度指数(CVI)用于确定一致率。各项目的重要性按0至3李克特量表进行排序。还计算了频率、平均相关性得分及频率重要性乘积。

结果

德尔菲调查显示,患者排序最高的领域与临床医生的相似,但压痛点强度(临床医生认为相关,患者不认为)和环境敏感性(患者认为重要,临床医生不认为)除外。最终形成了一个8项模型,被认为具有足够的效度。

结论

德尔菲调查确定并排列了FM研究中需要评估的相关关键临床领域。基于这些结果,可开发一种新的患者报告综合结局指标并用于临床试验。

相似文献

1
Preliminary identification of key clinical domains for outcome evaluation in fibromyalgia using the Delphi method: the Italian experience.运用德尔菲法对纤维肌痛症结局评估的关键临床领域进行初步识别:意大利的经验
Reumatismo. 2012 Mar 19;64(1):27-34. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2012.27.
2
Identifying the clinical domains of fibromyalgia: contributions from clinician and patient Delphi exercises.确定纤维肌痛的临床领域:临床医生和患者德尔菲法练习的贡献
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul 15;59(7):952-60. doi: 10.1002/art.23826.
3
Fibromyalgia syndrome.纤维肌痛综合征
J Rheumatol. 2005 Nov;32(11):2270-7.
4
Do we need core sets of fibromyalgia domains? The assessment of fibromyalgia (and other rheumatic disorders) in clinical practice.我们是否需要纤维肌痛的核心领域集?纤维肌痛(和其他风湿性疾病)的临床评估。
J Rheumatol. 2011 Jun;38(6):1104-12. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100511. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
5
Psychometric properties of the Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (FAS) index: a national web-based study of fibromyalgia.纤维肌痛评估状况(FAS)指数的心理测量特性:一项全国性的纤维肌痛网络研究。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6 Suppl 69):S49-54. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
6
Symptom clusters in fibromyalgia: potential utility in patient assessment and treatment evaluation.纤维肌痛中的症状群:在患者评估和治疗评价中的潜在效用。
Nurs Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;58(5):359-67. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181b499d2.
7
Evaluation of the accuracy of several symptoms and domains in distinguishing patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia from healthy controls.评估多种症状及领域在区分纤维肌痛症确诊患者与健康对照者方面的准确性。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34(2 Suppl 96):S14-25. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Measuring the epidemiology of distress: the rheumatology distress index.测量痛苦的流行病学:风湿病痛苦指数
J Rheumatol. 2000 Aug;27(8):2000-9.
9
The Spanish version of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for fibromyalgia: reliability and validity assessment.2010年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛初步诊断标准的西班牙语版本:可靠性和有效性评估。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34(2 Suppl 96):S55-8. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
10
Validation of the modified 2010 American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in a Spanish population.验证改良后的 2010 年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛诊断标准在西班牙人群中的适用性。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Oct;53(10):1803-11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu169. Epub 2014 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome sets.患者及照护者参与情况以及质性研究在核心结局集制定中的应用综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0172937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172937. eCollection 2017.