University of Brasília, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):177-82. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242012000200015.
This study examined the immediate bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesives to demineralized dentin saturated with either water or absolute ethanol. The research hypothesis was that there would be no difference in bond strength to dentin between water or ethanol wet-bonding techniques. The medium dentin of 20 third molars was exposed (n = 5). The dentin surface was then acid-etched, left moist and randomly assigned to be saturated via either water wet-bonding (WBT) or absolute ethanol wet-bonding (EBT). The specimens were then treated with one of the following etch-and-rinse adhesive systems: a 3-step, water-based system (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose, or SBMP) or a 2-step, ethanol/water-based system (Adper Single Bond 2, or SB). Resin composite build-ups were then incrementally constructed. After water storage for 24 h at 37°C, the tensile strength of the specimens was tested in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (a = 5%). The failure modes were verified using a stereomicroscope (40'). For both adhesives, no significant difference in bond strength was observed between WBT and EBT (p > 0.05). The highest bond strength was observed for SB, regardless of the bonding technique (p < 0.05). No significant interaction between adhesives and bonding techniques was noticed (p = 0.597). There was a predominance of adhesive failures for all tested groups. The EBT and WBT displayed similar immediate bond strength means for both adhesives. The SB adhesive exhibited higher means for all conditions tested. Further investigations are needed to evaluate long-term bonding to dentin mediated by commercial etch-and-rinse adhesives using the EBT approach.
本研究旨在检测经酸蚀处理后的牙本质,用去离子水或无水乙醇饱和后,各润湿性处理对通用型粘接剂与牙本质即刻粘接强度的影响。研究假设为去离子水和无水乙醇两种润湿性处理方法对牙本质的粘接强度无差异。20 个第三磨牙的中份牙本质被暴露出来(n = 5)。牙本质表面经酸蚀后,保持湿润并随机分为去离子水湿粘接(WBT)或无水乙醇湿粘接(EBT)。然后,用以下两种通用型粘接剂系统中的一种处理样本:三步法、水基粘接剂(Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose,SBMP)或两步法、乙醇/水基粘接剂(Adper Single Bond 2,SB)。然后逐步构建树脂复合材料。37°C 下在水中储存 24 h 后,在万能材料试验机上测试试件的拉伸强度(0.5 mm/min)。采用双因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验(a = 0.05)对数据进行分析。使用立体显微镜(40°)验证失效模式。对于两种粘接剂,WBT 和 EBT 之间的粘接强度均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。无论粘接技术如何,SB 的粘接强度均最高(p < 0.05)。粘接剂和粘接技术之间无显著的相互作用(p = 0.597)。所有测试组均以粘接破坏为主。EBT 和 WBT 对两种粘接剂均显示出相似的即刻粘接强度均值。所有测试条件下,SB 粘接剂的均值均较高。需要进一步的研究来评估使用 EBT 方法,商用通用型酸蚀剂对牙本质的长期粘接效果。