• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

["神经与老年康复独立性评分(SINGER)——一种新评估工具的开发与验证"]

["Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation (SINGER)" - development and validation of a new assessment instrument].

作者信息

Gerdes N, Funke U-N, Schüwer U, Themann P, Pfeiffer G, Meffert C

机构信息

Hochrhein-Institut am RehaKlinikum, Bad Säckingen.

出版信息

Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2012 Oct;51(5):289-99. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1287805. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1287805
PMID:22473480
Abstract

In the context of developing and testing a procedure for "Outcome-oriented payment for rehabilitation after stroke", we found that the instruments commonly used to measure the outcomes of rehabilitation after stroke (e. g., Barthel-Index or FIM) were not meeting the special requirements of the new payment system. Therefore the "Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation" (SINGER) was developed as a new assessment instrument. This instrument is based on the ICF and measures 20 aspects of "independence in activities of daily living". The characteristic feature of the SINGER is, above all, the way all items are graded in 6 steps: the gradation does not refer to the degree of disability but to the kind and amount of help required for the respective activity, i. e.: 0 = totally dependent on professional help; 1 = professional contact help needed; 2 = contact help by (instructed) lay persons sufficient; 3 = preparation or supervision by lay persons still needed; 4 = independent with assistive device or still slow; 5 = independent without assistive device. For experienced personnel in neurologic rehabilitation, these gradations are "intuitively plausible". A manual moreover describes each grade in detail for each item so that the instrument can be used in rehabilitation facilities without extensive training. The SINGER has been tested and validated in a pilot study (n = 100) and in 2 subsequent studies with large case numbers in neurologic rehabilitation (n = 1058 and n = 700 patients after stroke in all categories of severity). Factor analyses showed that the instrument contains 2 dimensions which can be interpreted as "physical activities" and "activities of communication and cognition". Each of these 2 dimensions can be split into 2 sub-dimensions that can be assigned to the tasks of therapeutical professions in care/Occupational Therapy, physiotherapy, logopedics, and neuro- psychology. The test criteria of reliability, sensitivity, convergent validity, floor and ceiling effects as well as sensitivity to change show good to very good results. Particular emphasis can be given to the high degree of interrater reliability and the wide range of possible applications in clinical practice as well as in research. A limitation of the instrument to be taken into account is the fact that the SINGER has not yet been tested and validated in geriatric rehabilitation facilities.

摘要

在制定和测试“中风后康复的结果导向型支付程序”的背景下,我们发现,常用于衡量中风后康复效果的工具(如巴氏指数或功能独立性测量)不符合新支付系统的特殊要求。因此,开发了“神经和老年康复独立评分”(SINGER)作为一种新的评估工具。该工具基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF),测量“日常生活活动独立性”的20个方面。SINGER的显著特点首先是所有项目按6个步骤分级的方式:分级不是指残疾程度,而是指相应活动所需帮助的种类和数量,即:0 = 完全依赖专业帮助;1 = 需要专业接触帮助;2 = (受过指导的)非专业人员的接触帮助足够;3 = 仍需要非专业人员的准备或监督;4 = 使用辅助设备独立或仍较慢;5 = 无需辅助设备独立。对于神经康复方面的经验丰富的人员来说,这些分级“直观上合理”。此外,手册还针对每个项目详细描述了每个等级,以便该工具在康复机构中无需大量培训即可使用。SINGER已在一项试点研究(n = 100)以及随后两项神经康复大样本研究(所有严重程度类别中的中风患者n = 1058和n = 700)中进行了测试和验证。因子分析表明,该工具包含2个维度,可解释为“身体活动”和“沟通与认知活动”。这2个维度中的每一个都可细分为2个子维度,可以分配给护理/职业治疗、物理治疗、言语治疗和神经心理学等治疗专业的任务。可靠性、敏感性、收敛效度、地板效应和天花板效应以及对变化的敏感性等测试标准显示出良好到非常好的结果。可以特别强调评分者间信度的高度以及在临床实践和研究中广泛的可能应用。该工具需要考虑的一个局限性是,SINGER尚未在老年康复机构中进行测试和验证。

相似文献

1
["Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation (SINGER)" - development and validation of a new assessment instrument].["神经与老年康复独立性评分(SINGER)——一种新评估工具的开发与验证"]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2012 Oct;51(5):289-99. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1287805. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
2
[Suitability of the SINGER as a tool for assessment in outpatient neurological rehabilitation].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2015 Feb;54(1):22-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394451. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
3
[Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel Index, the Activity Index, and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living: The use of ADL instruments in stroke rehabilitation by medical and non medical personnel].[巴氏指数、活动指数及诺丁汉日常生活扩展活动量表的评分者间信度:医疗及非医疗人员在脑卒中康复中对日常生活活动量表的应用]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Apr;43(2):75-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-814898.
4
Cross-diagnostic validity in a generic instrument: an example from the Functional Independence Measure in Scandinavia.通用工具中的交叉诊断效度:来自斯堪的纳维亚地区功能独立性测量的一个例子。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Aug 23;4:55. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-55.
5
[Neurological Reha-Score. An instrument to measure outcome and expenditure of neurologic rehabilitation].
Nervenarzt. 2006 Dec;77(12):1456-63. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2167-y.
6
[Pay for performance in rehabilitation after stroke - results of a pilot project 2001-2008].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2009 Aug;48(4):190-201. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1231061. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
7
Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke.确定中风患者功能独立性测量量表的最小临床重要差异。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130.
8
Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain.完善康复结果测量的概念基础:个人护理和工具性活动领域
Med Care. 2004 Jan;42(1 Suppl):I62-72. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000103521.84103.21.
9
Clinical utility of the AlphaFIM® instrument in stroke rehabilitation.AlphaFIM® 仪器在中风康复中的临床效用。
Int J Stroke. 2012 Feb;7(2):118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00694.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
10
[Participation Following Stroke - Validation of the German Version of IMPACT-S].[中风后的参与度——德国版IMPACT-S的验证]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2015 Jun;54(3):160-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545358. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between dysphagia and symptoms of depression and anxiety after ischemic stroke.缺血性脑卒中后吞咽困难与抑郁和焦虑症状的关系。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 May;31(5):e16224. doi: 10.1111/ene.16224. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
2
How are they doing as adults? Psychosocial and socioeconomic outcomes 11-30 years after pediatric epilepsy surgery.他们成年后的情况如何?儿科癫痫手术后 11-30 年的心理社会和社会经济结局。
Epilepsia Open. 2023 Sep;8(3):797-810. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12736. Epub 2023 May 5.
3
Feasibility of an individualised, task-oriented, video-supported home exercise programme for arm function in patients in the subacute phase after stroke: protocol of a randomised controlled pilot study.
个体定向、任务导向、视频支持的家庭上肢运动方案对脑卒中亚急性期患者上肢功能的可行性:一项随机对照预试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 4;12(1):e051504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051504.
4
Neuropsychological Evaluations in Limbic Encephalitis.边缘性脑炎的神经心理学评估
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 29;11(5):576. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050576.