Yi Eun Sang, Lee Soo Hyun, Son Meong Hi, Kim Ju Youn, Cho Eun Joo, Lim Su Jin, Cheuh Hee Won, Yoo Keon Hee, Sung Ki Woong, Koo Hong Hoe
Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Pediatr. 2012 Mar;55(3):93-9. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2012.55.3.93. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
This study compared outcomes in children with acute leukemia who underwent transplantations with umbilical cord blood (UCB), bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cells from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor (MRD) or an unrelated donor (URD).
This retrospective study included consecutive acute leukemia patients who underwent their first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at Samsung Medical Center between 2005 and 2010. Patients received stem cells from MRD (n=33), URD (n=46), or UCB (n=41).
Neutrophil and platelet recovery were significantly longer after HSCT with UCB than with MRD or URD (P<0.01 for both). In multivariate analysis using the MRD group as a reference, the URD group had a significantly higher risk of grade III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; relative risk [RR], 15.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 186.2; P=0.03) and extensive chronic GVHD (RR, 6.9; 95% CI, 1.9 to 25.2; P<0.01). For all 3 donor types, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival were similar. Extensive chronic GVHD was associated with fewer relapses (RR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.6; P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that lower EFS was associated with advanced disease at transplantation (RR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.8; P<0.01) and total body irradiation (RR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.3; P=0.04).
Survival after UCB transplantation was similar to survival after MRD and URD transplantation. For patients lacking an HLA matched donor, the use of UCB is a suitable alternative.
本研究比较了接受来自人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配的相关供者(MRD)或无关供者(URD)的脐带血(UCB)、骨髓或外周血干细胞移植的急性白血病患儿的治疗结果。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2005年至2010年期间在三星医疗中心接受首次异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的连续性急性白血病患者。患者接受来自MRD(n = 33)、URD(n = 46)或UCB(n = 41)的干细胞。
与接受MRD或URD移植的患者相比,接受UCB移植的患者在HSCT后中性粒细胞和血小板恢复明显更长(两者P均<0.01)。在以MRD组作为对照的多因素分析中,URD组发生III至IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的风险显著更高(相对风险[RR],15.2;95%置信区间[CI],1.2至186.2;P = 0.03),广泛慢性GVHD的风险也显著更高(RR,6.9;95% CI,1.9至25.2;P < 0.01)。对于所有3种供者类型,5年无事件生存率(EFS)和总生存率相似。广泛慢性GVHD与复发较少相关(RR,0.1;95% CI,0.04至0.6;P < 0.01)。多因素分析显示,较低的EFS与移植时疾病进展(RR,3.2;95% CI,1.3至7.8;P < 0.01)和全身照射(RR,2.1;95% CI,1.0至4.3;P = 0.04)相关。
UCB移植后的生存率与MRD和URD移植后的生存率相似。对于缺乏HLA匹配供者的患者,使用UCB是一种合适的选择。