Suppr超能文献

与匹配的相关或无关供体移植相比,高危急性髓系白血病患者在脐血移植前采用非清髓性预处理方案的预后较差。

Poor outcome with nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen before cord blood transplantation for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia compared with matched related or unrelated donor transplantation.

作者信息

Devillier Raynier, Harbi Samia, Fürst Sabine, Crocchiolo Roberto, El-Cheikh Jean, Castagna Luca, Etienne Anne, Calmels Boris, Lemarie Claude, Prebet Thomas, Granata Angela, Charbonnier Aude, Rey Jérôme, Chabannon Christian, Faucher Catherine, Vey Norbert, Blaise Didier

机构信息

Hematology Department, Transplantation Program, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France; Inserm UMR 1068/Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Marseille, France.

Hematology Department, Transplantation Program, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Oct;20(10):1560-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 14.

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is recommended for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In many situations, a matched related (MRD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) is lacking, in which case unrelated cord blood units (UCB) provide an alternative. We analyzed the outcome of consecutive high-risk AML patients prepared with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens and allografted with UCB (n = 32) and compared their outcome with high-risk AML patients who underwent transplantation with MRD/MUD (n = 49) in the same period of time. Grade III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred slightly more frequently in the UCB group (25%) than in the MRD/MUD group (8%) (P = .069). Conversely, we found a lower incidence of extensive chronic GVHD in the UCB group (6%) than in the MRD/MUD group (20%, P = .085). Nonrelapse mortality at 4 years was 16% and 22% in the UCB and MRD/MUD groups, respectively (P = .529). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 4 years was significantly higher in the UCB group (60%) than in the MRD/MUD group (27%, P = .006). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) at 4 years were 25% and 34%, respectively, in the UCB group and 50% and 56%, respectively, in the MRD/MUD group (LFS, P = .029; OS, P = .072). Multivariate analyses adjusted by cytogenetics and disease status at the time of Allo-HSCT revealed that use of UCB remained an independent predictive factor of shorter LFS (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.6; P = .018), and was associated with a trend for shorter OS (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, .9 to 3.2; P = .093). Whereas UCB provides an alternative for patients with high-risk AML lacking an MRD/MUD, the high incidence of relapse after RIC-based UCB Allo-HSCT is a concern. Attempts to improve leukemic control with UCB Allo-HSCT are warranted, as well as the evaluation of other alternative donors in this context.

摘要

异基因造血干细胞移植(Allo-HSCT)推荐用于高危急性髓系白血病(AML)患者。在很多情况下,缺乏匹配的亲属供者(MRD)或匹配的非亲属供者(MUD),在这种情况下,非亲属脐血单位(UCB)提供了一种替代方案。我们分析了接受减低强度预处理(RIC)方案并接受UCB移植的连续性高危AML患者(n = 32)的结局,并将其结局与同期接受MRD/MUD移植的高危AML患者(n = 49)进行比较。III至IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)在UCB组(25%)中的发生频率略高于MRD/MUD组(8%)(P = 0.069)。相反,我们发现UCB组广泛慢性GVHD的发生率(6%)低于MRD/MUD组(20%,P = 0.085)。UCB组和MRD/MUD组4年时的非复发死亡率分别为16%和22%(P = 0.529)。UCB组4年时的累积复发率(60%)显著高于MRD/MUD组(27%,P = 0.006)。UCB组4年时的无白血病生存率(LFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为25%和34%,MRD/MUD组分别为50%和56%(LFS,P = 0.029;OS,P = 0.072)。根据Allo-HSCT时的细胞遗传学和疾病状态进行的多变量分析显示,使用UCB仍然是LFS较短的独立预测因素(风险比,2.0;95%置信区间,1.1至3.6;P = 0.018),并且与OS较短的趋势相关(风险比,1.7;95%置信区间,0.9至3.2;P = 0.093)。虽然UCB为缺乏MRD/MUD的高危AML患者提供了一种替代方案,但基于RIC的UCB Allo-HSCT后复发率高是一个令人担忧的问题。有必要尝试通过UCB Allo-HSCT改善白血病控制,以及在此背景下评估其他替代供者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验