Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug;19(8):2563-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2315-5. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Even after complete response (CR) to regional chemotherapy for in-transit melanoma, many patients develop recurrence. Understanding the probability, location, and timing of recurrences can optimize management strategies for this patient population.
A prospective database identified patients who underwent 81 first-time hyperthermic isolated limb perfusions (HILPs) and 133 first-time isolated limb infusions (ILIs). Response was defined using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; recurrence was defined as development of new disease after in-field CR.
HILP exhibited a significantly higher CR rate than ILI (44 vs. 28 %, p = .01). Among 36 HILP-CRs and 37 ILI-CRs, the 3-year recurrence rate was 65 % (95 % confidence interval [95 % CI]: 43-79 %) and 85 % (95 % CI: 63-94%), respectively. Median time to first recurrence was longer for HILP-CR than ILI-CR (23 vs. 8 months, p = .02). There was no statistically significant difference in median time to in-field recurrence between HILP-CR and ILI-CR (46 vs. 25 months, p = .15), but HILP-CR showed a longer median time to out-of-field recurrence (42 vs. 14 months, p = .02). Finally, the overall survival (OS) difference between HILP-CR and ILI-CR (3-year survival: 77 vs. 54 %) did not achieve statistical significance (p = .10).
In the largest series comparing patterns of recurrence, we demonstrate that out-of-field recurrence after CR to HILP occurs later than after CR to ILI, though control of in-field disease remains similar. There remains no statistically significant difference in overall survival after CR to the 2 procedures.
即使转移性黑色素瘤患者经区域性化疗达到完全缓解(CR),仍有许多患者会复发。了解复发的可能性、位置和时间可优化此类患者人群的管理策略。
前瞻性数据库纳入了 81 例首次行高热隔离肢体灌注(HILP)和 133 例首次行隔离肢体输注(ILI)的患者。采用实体瘤反应评价标准定义缓解;将新发病灶的出现定义为 CR 后发生的局部复发。
HILP 的 CR 率显著高于 ILI(44%比 28%,p=0.01)。在 36 例 HILP-CR 和 37 例 ILI-CR 中,3 年复发率分别为 65%(95%置信区间[95%CI]:43-79%)和 85%(95%CI:63-94%)。HILP-CR 的首次复发中位时间长于 ILI-CR(23 比 8 个月,p=0.02)。HILP-CR 和 ILI-CR 的局部复发中位时间无统计学差异(46 比 25 个月,p=0.15),但 HILP-CR 的远处复发中位时间更长(42 比 14 个月,p=0.02)。最后,HILP-CR 和 ILI-CR 的总生存(OS)差异(3 年生存率:77%比 54%)未达到统计学意义(p=0.10)。
在比较复发模式的最大系列研究中,我们证明了 CR 后 HILP 发生远处复发的时间晚于 ILI,尽管控制局部疾病的效果相似。CR 后这两种治疗方法的总生存无统计学差异。