• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用手动血栓切除术导管输送Filtrap冠状动脉栓塞保护过滤器的新方法:与传统方法的体外和体内比较。

A novel method to deliver the Filtrap coronary embolic protection filter using a manual thrombectomy catheter: in vitro and in vivo comparison with the conventional method.

作者信息

Watanabe Shin, Saito Naritatsu, Tokushige Akihiro, Bingyuan Bao, Kawase Yoshiaki, Kimura Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Apr;24(4):159-63.

PMID:22477751
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although several types of distal embolic protection devices have been developed, they are usually difficult to use because of their stiff and bulky characteristics. We present a novel method to deliver the coronary embolic protection filter via a manual thrombectomy catheter.

METHODS

We modified the Filtrap embolic protection filter (Nipro Corporation) to pass through the aspiration thrombectomy catheter. Three interventional cardiologists performed the Filtrap delivery with in vivo and in vitro coronary arteries using two different methods. The in vitro experiments were performed using a Circuit Cardiac Catheterization Simulator (Just Medical Corporation) with and without coronary artery stenosis. The in vivo experiment was performed using a normal pig coronary artery. The times required for Filtrap delivery in the two different methods were compared. The target lesions were the main and side branch of the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries.

RESULTS

The average Filtrap delivery time when using the thrombectomy catheter was significantly shorter compared to the time using the conventional method (in vitro experiment without coronary stenosis, 39 ± 14 seconds vs 30 ± 6 seconds and P=.019; in vitro experiment with multiple coronary stenosis, 69 ± 55 seconds vs 32 ± 11 seconds and P=.012; in vivo experiment, 169 ± 166 seconds vs 51 ± 12 seconds; P=.019).

CONCLUSION

The study results indicate that delivery of the coronary embolic protection filter via a manual thrombectomy catheter may simplify the procedure and decrease the procedure time.

摘要

背景

尽管已研发出几种类型的远端栓塞保护装置,但由于其僵硬和笨重的特性,通常难以使用。我们提出了一种通过手动血栓切除术导管输送冠状动脉栓塞保护过滤器的新方法。

方法

我们对Filtrap栓塞保护过滤器(日医工株式会社)进行了改良,使其能够通过抽吸血栓切除术导管。三名介入心脏病学家使用两种不同方法在体内和体外冠状动脉中进行Filtrap输送。体外实验使用了带有和不带有冠状动脉狭窄的电路心脏导管插入模拟器(Just Medical Corporation)。体内实验使用正常猪的冠状动脉进行。比较了两种不同方法中Filtrap输送所需的时间。目标病变为左前降支、左旋支和右冠状动脉的主支和分支。

结果

与使用传统方法相比,使用血栓切除术导管时Filtrap的平均输送时间明显更短(体外无冠状动脉狭窄实验,39±14秒对30±6秒,P = 0.019;体外多冠状动脉狭窄实验,69±55秒对32±11秒,P = 0.012;体内实验,169±166秒对51±12秒;P = 0.019)。

结论

研究结果表明,通过手动血栓切除术导管输送冠状动脉栓塞保护过滤器可能会简化操作并缩短操作时间。

相似文献

1
A novel method to deliver the Filtrap coronary embolic protection filter using a manual thrombectomy catheter: in vitro and in vivo comparison with the conventional method.一种使用手动血栓切除术导管输送Filtrap冠状动脉栓塞保护过滤器的新方法:与传统方法的体外和体内比较。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Apr;24(4):159-63.
2
Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时的血栓抽吸。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Jan;13(1):16-23. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32834becee.
3
Role of adjunctive thrombectomy and embolic protection devices in acute myocardial infarction: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials.辅助血栓切除术和栓子保护装置在急性心肌梗死中的作用:随机试验的综合荟萃分析
Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):2989-3001. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn421. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
4
Mechanical thrombectomy options in complex percutaneous coronary interventions.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Dec;68(6):917-28. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20894.
5
Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing anti-embolic devices with standard PCI for improving myocardial reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction.比较抗栓装置与标准经皮冠状动脉介入治疗以改善急性心肌梗死患者心肌再灌注的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Mar 1;69(4):488-96. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20990.
6
Preclinical evaluation of a rheolytic catheter for percutaneous coronary artery/saphenous vein graft thrombectomy.
J Invasive Cardiol. 1999 Aug;11(8):475-84.
7
Morphometric analysis of particulate debris extracted by four different embolic protection devices from coronary arteries, aortocoronary saphenous vein conduits, and carotid arteries.对通过四种不同的栓子保护装置从冠状动脉、主动脉冠状动脉隐静脉移植血管和颈动脉中提取的颗粒碎片进行形态计量分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jun 15;95(12):1415-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.006.
8
Synergism of rheolytic thrombectomy and embolic distal protection using the percusurge guard wire for fresh thrombus removal: an in vitro study.使用Percusurge保护导丝进行血栓溶解血栓切除术和栓塞远端保护以清除新鲜血栓的协同作用:一项体外研究。
Acute Card Care. 2006;8(1):31-4. doi: 10.1080/14628840600623757.
9
[A multi-device approach to an unusual case of left main thrombosis: when manual thrombectomy is not enough].[一种针对左主干血栓形成罕见病例的多设备治疗方法:当手动血栓切除术不足时]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2013 Oct;14(10):677-80. doi: 10.1714/1335.14835.
10
Adjunctive manual thrombectomy improves myocardial perfusion and mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.辅助手动血栓切除术可改善接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的心肌灌注并降低死亡率:一项随机试验的荟萃分析
Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):3002-10. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn389. Epub 2008 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Distal Protection with Filter-Type Device on Long-term Outcome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Results with Filtrap.滤器型装置远端保护对急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期预后的影响:Filtrap的临床结果
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016 Dec 1;23(12):1313-1323. doi: 10.5551/jat.34215. Epub 2016 Jun 2.