• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人群中吗氯贝胺与第二代抗抑郁药的比较。

Moclobemide compared with second-generation antidepressants in elderly people.

作者信息

De Vanna M, Kummer J, Agnoli A, Gentili P, Lorizio A, Anand R

机构信息

Clinica Psichiatrica, Universita di Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:64-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05335.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05335.x
PMID:2248077
Abstract

Two multicentre studies are described here; the first compared moclobemide with mianserin and the second with maprotiline, both in elderly patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of major depressive episode. In the first study, 80 eligible patients were randomized to either moclobemide 300-500 mg or mianserin 75-125 mg per day for 4 weeks. Mean reduction in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score was 52% in both groups. The overall assessment of efficacy was good or very good for 60% of the patients, and tolerance was considered good or very good for 85% of the patients in both groups; no significant differences between the 2 treatments were seen. The second study comprised 39 hospitalized patients randomized to either moclobemide 150-300 mg daily or maprotiline 75-150 mg daily for 6 weeks. At the end of treatment, HRSD scores declined 85% in both groups compared with baseline. The overall assessment of efficacy was over 90% good or very good in both groups. Tolerance was rated good or very good for 80% of moclobemide and 75% of maprotiline patients; none of these results differed significantly between the groups, indicating that moclobemide is as effective in elderly patients as the 2 second-generation antidepressants. In view of the safety of moclobemide, it should be considered first-line therapy for depression in elderly people.

摘要

本文介绍了两项多中心研究;第一项研究比较了吗氯贝胺与米安色林,第二项研究比较了吗氯贝胺与马普替林,研究对象均为符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版》(DSM - III)中重度抑郁发作诊断标准的老年患者。在第一项研究中,80名符合条件的患者被随机分为两组,一组每天服用300 - 500毫克吗氯贝胺,另一组每天服用75 - 125毫克米安色林,为期4周。两组患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD)评分平均降低了52%。60%的患者对疗效的总体评估为良好或非常好,两组中85%的患者耐受性被认为良好或非常好;两种治疗方法之间未观察到显著差异。第二项研究包括39名住院患者,他们被随机分为两组,一组每天服用150 - 300毫克吗氯贝胺,另一组每天服用75 - 150毫克马普替林,为期6周。治疗结束时,两组患者的HRSD评分与基线相比均下降了85%。两组中疗效总体评估为良好或非常好的比例均超过90%。80%服用吗氯贝胺的患者和75%服用马普替林的患者耐受性被评为良好或非常好;这些结果在两组之间均无显著差异,表明吗氯贝胺在老年患者中的疗效与这两种第二代抗抑郁药相当。鉴于吗氯贝胺的安全性,它应被视为老年抑郁症的一线治疗药物。

相似文献

1
Moclobemide compared with second-generation antidepressants in elderly people.老年人群中吗氯贝胺与第二代抗抑郁药的比较。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:64-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05335.x.
2
Efficacy and safety of moclobemide compared with maprotiline in treatment of major depressive disorder. A double-blind multicenter study with parallel groups.吗氯贝胺与马普替林治疗重度抑郁症的疗效和安全性比较。一项双盲平行组多中心研究。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1993 Nov;26(6):246-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014362.
3
Therapeutic efficacy of antidepressants in agitated anxious depression--a meta-analysis of moclobemide studies.
J Affect Disord. 1995 Oct 9;35(1-2):21-30. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(95)00034-k.
4
Multicenter double-blind study of moclobemide and maprotiline.吗氯贝胺与马普替林的多中心双盲研究。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994;17 Suppl 1:S38-49. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199417001-00006.
5
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide and maprotiline in depressed patients treated by general practitioners.全科医生治疗的抑郁症患者中吗氯贝胺与马普替林的疗效及耐受性比较。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994;17 Suppl 1:S29-37. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199417001-00005.
6
Moclobemide versus tranylcypromine in the treatment of depression.吗氯贝胺与反苯环丙胺治疗抑郁症的比较
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:61-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05333.x.
7
Moclobemide and maprotiline in the treatment of inpatients with major depressive disorder.吗氯贝胺与马普替林治疗重度抑郁症住院患者的疗效观察
J Neural Transm Suppl. 1989;28:45-52.
8
Moclobemide versus placebo in the treatment of depression: a multicentre study in Belgium.吗氯贝胺与安慰剂治疗抑郁症的对比:比利时的一项多中心研究
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05323.x.
9
Moclobemide versus clomipramine in the treatment of depression: a double-blind multicentre study in Belgium.吗氯贝胺与氯米帕明治疗抑郁症的对比:比利时的一项双盲多中心研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:50-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05328.x.
10
Moclobemide (Ro 11-1163) versus desipramine in the treatment of endogenous depression.吗氯贝胺(Ro 11 - 1163)与地昔帕明治疗内源性抑郁症的对比研究
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:44-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05325.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Antidepressants for depressed elderly.用于老年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD003491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003491.pub2.
2
Moclobemide: therapeutic use and clinical studies.吗氯贝胺:治疗用途及临床研究。
CNS Drug Rev. 2003 Spring;9(1):97-140. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2003.tb00245.x.
3
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors. A perspective on their use in the elderly.单胺氧化酶抑制剂。关于其在老年人中应用的观点。
Drugs Aging. 1998 Nov;13(5):341-55. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199813050-00002.
4
Antidepressant use in the elderly. Current status of nefazodone, venlafaxine and moclobemide.老年人使用抗抑郁药。奈法唑酮、文拉法辛和吗氯贝胺的现状。
Drugs Aging. 1997 Aug;11(2):119-31. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199711020-00004.
5
Drug therapy for geriatric depression.老年抑郁症的药物治疗
Drugs Aging. 1993 May-Jun;3(3):195-219. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199303030-00002.
6
Minor depression in the aged. Concepts, prevalence and optimal management.老年人的轻度抑郁症。概念、患病率及最佳管理
Drugs Aging. 1995 Apr;6(4):278-92. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199506040-00003.