Vaz-Serra A, Figueira M L, Firmino H, Albuquerque A J, Jara J M, Pestana L C
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994;17 Suppl 1:S38-49. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199417001-00006.
A randomized double-blind, multicenter 6-week study was undertaken in 80 depressed patients to compare the effects of moclobemide, a selective and reversible monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor (300 mg daily), and maprotiline (75 mg daily). Efficacy was assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Tolerability was assessed by adverse events reports. After 6 weeks of therapy, both groups of patients showed significant improvement in HDRS and CGI. Speed of onset of action was faster with moclobemide (significant difference at week 3, p = 0.025). There was a significant reduction of depression ratings (HDRS) in both the moclobemide and maprotiline group in all types of depression according to ICD-9 criteria (major depressive disorder, neurotic depression and adjustment-prolonged depressive reaction). Significantly fewer patients in the moclobemide group reported adverse events (28.9% compared with 70.2%) including weight gain (2.6% compared to 21.6%). Anticholinergic side effects were less frequent with moclobemide. It is concluded that both drugs are at least equivalent in terms of therapeutic efficacy, but moclobemide is better tolerated.
对80名抑郁症患者进行了一项随机双盲、多中心的6周研究,以比较选择性可逆单胺氧化酶-A抑制剂吗氯贝胺(每日300毫克)和马普替林(每日75毫克)的效果。通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)和临床总体印象(CGI)评估疗效。通过不良事件报告评估耐受性。治疗6周后,两组患者的HDRS和CGI均有显著改善。吗氯贝胺起效更快(第3周有显著差异,p = 0.025)。根据国际疾病分类第九版标准(重度抑郁症、神经症性抑郁症和适应性-延长性抑郁反应),吗氯贝胺组和马普替林组的所有类型抑郁症患者的抑郁评分(HDRS)均显著降低。吗氯贝胺组报告不良事件的患者明显较少(28.9%,而马普替林组为70.2%),包括体重增加(2.6%,而马普替林组为21.6%)。吗氯贝胺的抗胆碱能副作用较少。结论是,两种药物在治疗效果方面至少相当,但吗氯贝胺耐受性更好。