Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital (CHUV) and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Epilepsy Behav. 2012 May;24(1):70-3. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.02.026. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly prescribed and seem to have a comparable efficacy as the classical AEDs; however, their impact on status epilepticus (SE) prognosis has received little attention. In our prospective SE database (2006-2010), we assessed the use of older versus newer AEDs (levetiracetam, pregabalin, topiramate, lacosamide) over time and its relationship to outcome (return to clinical baseline conditions, new handicap, or death). Newer AEDs were used more often toward the end of the study period (42% of episodes versus 30%). After adjustment for SE etiology, SE severity score, and number of compounds needed to terminate SE, newer AEDs were independently related to a reduced likelihood of return to baseline (p<0.001) but not to increased mortality. These findings seem in line with recent findings on refractory epilepsy. Also, in view of the higher price of the newer AEDs, well-designed, prospective assessments analyzing the impact of newer AEDs on efficacy and tolerability in patients with SE appear mandatory.
新型抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的应用日益增多,其疗效似乎与经典 AEDs 相当;然而,它们对癫痫持续状态(SE)预后的影响却很少受到关注。在我们的前瞻性 SE 数据库(2006-2010 年)中,我们评估了随着时间的推移,使用较新和较旧的 AEDs(左乙拉西坦、普瑞巴林、托吡酯、拉科酰胺)的情况及其与结局(恢复临床基线状态、新的残疾或死亡)的关系。在研究后期,新型 AEDs 的使用频率更高(42%的发作与 30%相比)。在调整 SE 病因、SE 严重程度评分和终止 SE 所需的化合物数量后,新型 AEDs 与更不可能恢复基线独立相关(p<0.001),但与死亡率增加无关。这些发现似乎与最近关于难治性癫痫的研究结果一致。此外,鉴于新型 AEDs 的价格较高,有必要进行精心设计的前瞻性评估,分析新型 AEDs 在 SE 患者中的疗效和耐受性方面的影响。