Suppr超能文献

阴道镜检查

Colposcopy.

作者信息

Pretorius R G, Belinson J L

机构信息

Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group-Fontana, Fontana, CA 92336, USA.

出版信息

Minerva Ginecol. 2012 Apr;64(2):173-80.

Abstract

Though in the 1980s, colposcopically-directed biopsy excluded over 90% of CIN 3 and cancer (CIN 3+), recent reviews found sensitivity of colposcopically-directed biopsy for CIN 3+ of 50-65%. Studies from China showed that the sensitivity of colposcopically-directed biopsy for CIN 3+ is higher for large CIN 3+ than for small CIN 3+ and higher for associated high-grade cervical cytology than for low-grade cervical cytology. Colposcopically-directed biopsy excluded over 90% of CIN 3+ in the 1980s because colposcopy clinics in the 1980s evaluated women with high-grade cytology that had large CIN 3+; it no longer excludes CIN 3+ well because current colposcopy clinics evaluate women with low-grade cytology that have small CIN 3+. When colposcopically-directed biopsy is used to exclude CIN 3+ our understanding of the natural history of CIN is skewed, errors occur in defining appropriate screening practice, and inaccurate diagnosis results in incorrect treatment. The impression that CIN is more common on the anterior lip of the cervix is an artifact introduced by the inaccuracy of colposcopy. An unjustified enthusiasm for screening with acetic acid aided visual inspection (VIA) occurred when the sensitivity of VIA for CIN 3+ was inflated by screening studies using colposcopically-directed biopsy as the gold-standard for CIN 3+. To limit the harm of inaccurate diagnosis associated with colposcopically-directed biopsy, at colposcopy we advise random biopsies at the squamocolumnar junction in cervical quadrants without visible lesions and, unless the woman is pregnant, endocervical curettage (ECC). As the diagnosis of CIN 3+ solely by ECC is uncommon in women under age 25, the ECC may be omitted in women under age 25 years. If multiple cervical biopsies are performed, to limit discomfort, a bronchoscopy biopsy instrument which obtains 2-mm biopsies should be used.

摘要

尽管在20世纪80年代,阴道镜引导下活检可排除90%以上的CIN 3和癌症(CIN 3+),但近期综述发现,阴道镜引导下活检对CIN 3+的敏感性为50%-65%。来自中国的研究表明,阴道镜引导下活检对大的CIN 3+的敏感性高于小的CIN 3+,对相关高级别宫颈细胞学的敏感性高于低级别宫颈细胞学。20世纪80年代,阴道镜引导下活检可排除90%以上的CIN 3+,因为20世纪80年代的阴道镜诊所评估的是患有大的CIN 3+的高级别细胞学女性;现在它不再能很好地排除CIN 3+,因为当前的阴道镜诊所评估的是患有小的CIN 3+的低级别细胞学女性。当使用阴道镜引导下活检来排除CIN 3+时,我们对CIN自然史的理解会出现偏差,在确定适当的筛查实践时会出现错误,不准确的诊断会导致不正确的治疗。认为CIN在宫颈前唇更常见的印象是由阴道镜检查不准确所导致的假象。当以阴道镜引导下活检作为CIN 3+的金标准的筛查研究夸大了醋酸辅助视觉检查(VIA)对CIN 3+的敏感性时,就出现了对VIA筛查的不合理热情。为了限制与阴道镜引导下活检相关的不准确诊断的危害,在阴道镜检查时,我们建议在宫颈象限的鳞柱交界处无可见病变处进行随机活检,除非该女性怀孕,否则进行宫颈管刮除术(ECC)。由于仅通过ECC诊断CIN 3+在25岁以下女性中并不常见,25岁以下女性可省略ECC。如果进行多次宫颈活检,为了减轻不适,应使用获取2毫米活检组织的支气管镜活检器械。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验