• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在解决方案空间中提问:评估公平性的方法学问题。

Asking questions in the solution space: methodological issues in evaluating equity.

作者信息

Carden Fred

机构信息

International Development Research Centre, Canada.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2013 Feb;36(1):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.010
PMID:22482394
Abstract

This paper presents an overview of some core methodological issues in improving the evaluation of health equity interventions. It argues that evaluation can play a central role in the solution space if it takes a futures orientation and develops adaptive approaches. It makes the case that purpose must drive method and that clarity in values is central. It suggests a process to rethink health equity interventions, reshape policy based on evaluation at the systems level, and reform evaluation of health equity so that it has the capacity to adapt and to more realistically reflect the dynamic and changing nature of systems.

摘要

本文概述了改善健康公平干预措施评估中的一些核心方法问题。它认为,如果评估以未来为导向并开发适应性方法,那么评估可以在解决方案空间中发挥核心作用。它指出目的必须驱动方法,价值观的清晰明确至关重要。它提出了一个重新思考健康公平干预措施、基于系统层面的评估重塑政策以及改革健康公平评估的过程,以使评估有能力适应并更现实地反映系统的动态变化性质。

相似文献

1
Asking questions in the solution space: methodological issues in evaluating equity.在解决方案空间中提问:评估公平性的方法学问题。
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Feb;36(1):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
2
Towards a performance measurement system for health equity in a local health integration network.迈向地方卫生整合网络中健康公平性的绩效评估体系。
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Feb;36(1):204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
3
Evaluating health inequity interventions: applying a contextual (external) validity framework to programs funded by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.评估健康公平干预措施:将情境(外部)有效性框架应用于加拿大卫生服务研究基金会资助的项目
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Feb;36(1):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
4
The conceptual model for nursing and health policy revisited.再探护理与卫生政策的概念模型。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2005 Nov;6(4):319-26. doi: 10.1177/1527154405283304.
5
The dynamics of health care reform--learning from a complex adaptive systems theoretical perspective.医疗保健改革的动态——从复杂适应系统理论视角学习
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010 Oct;14(4):525-40.
6
Why performance-based contracting failed in Uganda--an "open-box" evaluation of a complex health system intervention.基于绩效的合同在乌干达为何失败——对一项复杂卫生系统干预措施的“开箱即用”评估
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(2):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
7
Three issues to consider in building effective children's mental health services.建立有效的儿童心理健康服务需要考虑的三个问题。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):181-4. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0265-4.
8
Quality of care in nursing home organizations: establishing a health services research agenda.养老院机构的护理质量:确立一项卫生服务研究议程。
Nurs Outlook. 2005 Nov-Dec;53(6):300-4. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.10.002.
9
Critical care cardiology research: a call to action.重症监护心脏病学研究:行动呼吁。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Mar 1;6(2):237-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.969501. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
10
Getting real about policy and practice needs: evaluation as a bridge between the problem and solution space.正视政策与实践需求:评估作为问题与解决方案空间之间的桥梁。
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Feb;36(1):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Mar 8.