• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PDO 萨莱奶酪木槽(“gerles”)中微生物生物膜的特征。

Characteristics of microbial biofilm on wooden vats ('gerles') in PDO Salers cheese.

机构信息

INRA, UR 545, Fromagères, 20 côte de Reyne, F-15000 Aurillac, France.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 May 15;156(2):91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.03.007
PMID:22483401
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize microbial biofilms from 'gerles' (wooden vats for making PDO Salers cheese) and identify their role in milk inoculation and in preventing pathogen development. Gerles from ten farms producing PDO Salers cheese were subjected to microbial analysis during at least 4 periods spread over two years. They were distinguished by their levels of Lactobacillus (between 4.50 and 6.01 log CFU/cm(2)), Gram negative bacteria (between 1.45 and 4.56 log CFU/cm(2)), yeasts (between 2.91 and 5.57 log CFU/cm(2)), and moulds (between 1.72 and 4.52 log CFU/cm(2)). They were then classed into 4 groups according their microbial characteristics. These 4 groups were characterized by different milk inoculations (with either sour whey or starter culture, daily or not), and different washing procedures (with water or whey from cheese making). The farm gerles were not contaminated by Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes or Staphylococcus aureus. Only one slight, punctual contamination was found on one gerle among the ten studied. Even when the milk was deliberately contaminated with L. monocytogenes and S. aureus in the 40 L experimental gerles, these pathogens were found neither on the gerle surfaces nor in the cheeses. Using 40 L experimental gerles it was shown that the microbial biofilms on the gerle surfaces formed in less than one week and then remained stable. They were mainly composed of a great diversity of lactic acid bacteria (Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus hilgardii,…), Gram positive catalase positive bacteria (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, Curtobacterium oceanosedimentum Citrococcus spp., Brachybacterium rhamnosum, Kocuria rhizophila, Arthrobacter spp.…) and yeast (Kluyveromyces lactis, Kluyveromyces marxianus). In less than 1 min, even in a 500 L farm gerle, the gerle's microbial biofilm can inoculate pasteurized milk with micro-organisms at levels superior to those in raw milk.

摘要

本研究的目的是对“gerles”(用于制作 PDO 萨莱奶酪的木制大桶)中的微生物生物膜进行特征描述,并确定其在牛奶接种和防止病原体发展方面的作用。在两年内的至少 4 个时期,对来自 10 个生产 PDO 萨莱奶酪的农场的 gerles 进行了微生物分析。它们的特征是乳杆菌(4.50 至 6.01 log CFU/cm(2))、革兰氏阴性菌(1.45 至 4.56 log CFU/cm(2))、酵母(2.91 至 5.57 log CFU/cm(2)) 和霉菌(1.72 至 4.52 log CFU/cm(2))。然后根据它们的微生物特性将它们分为 4 组。这 4 组的特点是不同的牛奶接种方式(使用酸乳或 starter culture,每天或不使用)和不同的洗涤程序(使用水或奶酪制作中的乳清)。在这 10 个研究的 gerles 中,没有发现沙门氏菌、单增李斯特菌或金黄色葡萄球菌污染。只有一个 gerle 出现了一次轻微的、局部的污染。即使在 40L 的实验 gerles 中故意将单核细胞增生李斯特菌和金黄色葡萄球菌污染牛奶,也未在 gerle 表面或奶酪中发现这些病原体。使用 40L 的实验 gerles 表明,gerle 表面的微生物生物膜在不到一周的时间内形成,然后保持稳定。它们主要由多种乳酸菌(肠膜明串珠菌、乳球菌乳脂亚种、干酪乳杆菌、植物乳杆菌、希氏乳杆菌等)、革兰氏阳性过氧化氢酶阳性菌(短状杆菌、海栖栖油杆菌属、柠檬酸球菌属、短双歧杆菌、罗伊氏乳杆菌属等)和酵母(乳酸克鲁维酵母、马克斯克鲁维酵母)组成。不到 1 分钟,即使在 500L 的农场 gerles 中,gerle 的微生物生物膜也可以用高于生奶水平的微生物接种巴氏杀菌奶。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of microbial biofilm on wooden vats ('gerles') in PDO Salers cheese.PDO 萨莱奶酪木槽(“gerles”)中微生物生物膜的特征。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 May 15;156(2):91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
2
Simplification of a complex microbial antilisterial consortium to evaluate the contribution of its flora in uncooked pressed cheese.简化复杂的微生物抗李斯特菌联合体,以评估其菌群在未熟压奶酪中的作用。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Feb 28;145(2-3):379-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.019. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
3
Influence of PDO Ragusano cheese biofilm microbiota on flavour compounds formation.拉古萨诺PDO奶酪生物膜微生物群对风味化合物形成的影响。
Food Microbiol. 2017 Feb;61:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
4
Formation and Characterization of Early Bacterial Biofilms on Different Wood Typologies Applied in Dairy Production.不同类型木材在乳制品生产中的早期细菌生物膜的形成与特性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Jan 31;84(4). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02107-17. Print 2018 Feb 15.
5
Tina wooden vat biofilm: a safe and highly efficient lactic acid bacteria delivering system in PDO Ragusano cheese making.蒂娜木桶生物膜:一种用于拉古萨诺PDO奶酪制作的安全且高效的乳酸菌递送系统。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Jun 1;132(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.026. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
6
Influence of the early bacterial biofilms developed on vats made with seven wood types on PDO Vastedda della valle del Belìce cheese characteristics.七种不同木材制作的 vat 上早期细菌生物膜的形成对 PDO Vastedda della valle del Belìce 奶酪特性的影响。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2019 Feb 16;291:91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
7
High-pressure processing of Turkish white cheese for microbial inactivation.土耳其白奶酪的高压处理用于微生物灭活
J Food Prot. 2008 Jan;71(1):102-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.1.102.
8
Nonstarter lactic acid bacteria biofilms and calcium lactate crystals in Cheddar cheese.切达干酪中未发酵的乳酸菌生物膜和乳酸钙晶体。
J Dairy Sci. 2006 May;89(5):1452-66. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72213-5.
9
Microbial and sensory changes throughout the ripening of Prato cheese made from milk with different levels of somatic cells.用不同体细胞水平的牛奶制成的普拉托奶酪在整个成熟过程中的微生物和感官变化。
J Dairy Sci. 2008 May;91(5):1743-50. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0639.
10
Microbiological quality and safety of raw milk and soft cheese and detection of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria with antagonistic activity against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Spp., and Staphylococcus aureus.生奶和软奶酪的微生物质量和安全性以及对单核细胞增生李斯特菌、沙门氏菌和金黄色葡萄球菌具有拮抗活性的本土乳酸菌的检测。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Feb;7(2):175-80. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0390.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing Environmental Background Microflora and Assessing Their Influence on Persistence in Dairy Processing Environment.表征环境背景微生物群落并评估它们对乳制品加工环境中持久性的影响。
Foods. 2025 May 10;14(10):1694. doi: 10.3390/foods14101694.
2
Wine Barrel Biofilm as a Source of Yeasts with Non-Conventional Properties.葡萄酒桶生物膜作为具有非常规特性酵母的来源
Microorganisms. 2024 Apr 27;12(5):880. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12050880.
3
The Microbial Diversity on the Surface of Smear-Ripened Cheeses and Its Impact on Cheese Quality and Safety.
涂抹成熟干酪表面的微生物多样性及其对干酪品质和安全性的影响。
Foods. 2024 Jan 10;13(2):214. doi: 10.3390/foods13020214.
4
A Multivariate Approach to Study the Bacterial Diversity Associated to the Wooden Shelves Used for Aging Traditional Sicilian Cheeses.一种多元方法用于研究与西西里传统陈酿奶酪所用木架相关的细菌多样性。
Foods. 2022 Mar 7;11(5):774. doi: 10.3390/foods11050774.
5
High Prevalence of Enterobacterales in the Smear of Surface-Ripened Cheese with Contribution to Organoleptic Properties.在具有感官特性的表面成熟奶酪涂片中肠杆菌科细菌的高流行率。
Foods. 2022 Jan 26;11(3):361. doi: 10.3390/foods11030361.
6
The Use of Ozone as an Eco-Friendly Strategy against Microbial Biofilm in Dairy Manufacturing Plants: A Review.臭氧作为乳制品加工厂中对抗微生物生物膜的环保策略的应用:综述
Microorganisms. 2022 Jan 13;10(1):162. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10010162.
7
Biodiversity and succession of lactic microbiota involved in Brazilian buffalo mozzarella cheese production.巴西布拉它乳清干酪生产中参与的乳酸菌的生物多样性和演替。
Braz J Microbiol. 2022 Mar;53(1):303-316. doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00629-6. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
8
Composition, Succession, and Source Tracking of Microbial Communities throughout the Traditional Production of a Farmstead Cheese.农家奶酪传统生产全过程中微生物群落的组成、演替及溯源
mSystems. 2021 Oct 26;6(5):e0083021. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00830-21. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
9
In-Depth Investigation of the Safety of Wooden Shelves Used for Traditional Cheese Ripening.深入调查传统奶酪成熟用木架子的安全性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Nov 10;87(23):e0152421. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01524-21. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
10
Current Trends of Enterococci in Dairy Products: A Comprehensive Review of Their Multiple Roles.乳制品中肠球菌的当前趋势:对其多种作用的全面综述
Foods. 2021 Apr 10;10(4):821. doi: 10.3390/foods10040821.