Gobbo Milena, Esteve-Vives Joaquim, Rivera Javier, Vallejo Miguel Ángel, Lopez-González Ruth
Unidad de Investigación, Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Madrid, Spain.
Reumatol Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
To analyze the responsiveness of the Fibromyalgia Health Assessment Questionnaire (FHAQ) in a group of patients with fibromyalgia (FM).
Observational, prospective and longitudinal study related to the project ICAF was taken part in 15 Spanish centers. 232 patients were included and diagnosed of FM: 98.3% were women, the mean age was 47 years old, they were analyzed at a basal visit and 3 months visit, afterwards an appropriated treatment was prescribed. The statistical analysis was performed including: mean comparison, mean standardized response (RME), basal standard media (DE), intraclass correlation coefficient (R), standard error of the mean (EEM), minimal detectable difference (DMD) and percentage change in real.
The difference in mean comparison of the FHAQ in the baseline visit and the 3 months visit was of 0.098 (95% CI: 0.034–0.16), with a P<.003. Nevertheless the RME was 0.21, a slightly change, the DE=0.57, R=0.81, EEM=0.25, and the DMD=0.69. The percentage change in real was 17% (39 patients). But the sense of the change was positive in 28 cases (less punctuation in the 3 months visit) and negative in other 11 cases (higher punctuation in the 3 months visit).
The punctuation in the 3 months visit was significant better than the basal, but the results of this study do not let it to consider that the FHAQ have enough change susceptibility to recommend it in longitudinal studies. The well knowing fact, some patients can become worse with the treatment prescribed would be to the detriment of the FHAQ psychometric value.
分析纤维肌痛健康评估问卷(FHAQ)在一组纤维肌痛(FM)患者中的反应性。
与ICAF项目相关的观察性、前瞻性和纵向研究在15个西班牙中心开展。纳入并诊断出232例FM患者:98.3%为女性,平均年龄47岁,在基线访视和3个月访视时进行分析,之后给予适当治疗。进行的统计分析包括:均值比较、平均标准化反应(RME)、基线标准中位数(DE)、组内相关系数(R)、均值标准误差(EEM)、最小可检测差异(DMD)和实际变化百分比。
FHAQ在基线访视和3个月访视时的均值比较差异为0.098(95%可信区间:0.034 - 0.16),P <.003。然而,RME为0.21,变化轻微,DE = 0.57,R = 0.81,EEM = 0.25,DMD = 0.69。实际变化百分比为17%(39例患者)。但变化方向为正向的有28例(3个月访视时得分较低),负向的有11例(3个月访视时得分较高)。
3个月访视时的得分显著优于基线,但本研究结果不支持认为FHAQ有足够的变化敏感性可在纵向研究中推荐使用。众所周知,一些患者可能会因所开处方的治疗而病情加重,这将损害FHAQ的心理测量价值。